ArticleBMC psychiatry2025
Elevated prolactin and association with treatment resistance indicators in first-hospitalized schizophrenia spectrum disorders: a real-world cohort study.
Article in BMC psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHyperprolactinemia frequently occurs during antipsychotic treatment but is also observed in antipsychotic-naïve schizophrenia patients. The relationship between prolactin (PRL) and treatment resistance remains underexplored in real-world populations.
objectiveTo characterize age-/sex-stratified PRL distribution in first-hospitalized schizophrenia spectrum disorder (SSD) patients and examine associations with treatment resistance proxies (clozapine use/rehospitalization).
methodsWe analyzed 4,103 first-hospitalized SSD patients using real-world data. PRL levels were stratified by age/sex. Binary logistic regression evaluated PRL-clozapine/rehospitalization associations with confounder adjustment. ROC analysis assessed PRL's discriminative capacity for clozapine use.
resultsElevated PRL prevalence was highest in females aged 18-45 (71.5%). PRL negatively correlated with clozapine use in males (P < 0.001), with lower median levels in users vs. non-users (374.40 vs. 529.10 mIU/L, P < 0.001). This persisted in males aged 18-45 (434.90 vs. 558.60 mIU/L) and ≥ 55 years (308.60 vs. 583.30 mIU/L) (both P < 0.01). In males ≥ 55, each 1 mIU/L PRL increase reduced clozapine use probability by 0.2% (aOR = 0.998, 95%CI:0.997-1.000). ROC analysis showed moderate discriminative capacity (AUC = 0.72, sensitivity 78.6%, specificity 39.4%). No significant associations occurred in females or for rehospitalization.
conclusionThe PRL demonstrates inverse, age-specific associations with clozapine use in male SSD patients, suggesting potential as a stratification biomarker for treatment resistance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.