ArticleBMC health services research2025
Developing a screening-guided volunteer-supported in-home respite services model: a modified online Delphi study.
Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGlobal population ageing is intensifying the demand for sustainable, person-centered care models that enable older adults to age in place. In-home respite services, particularly those supported by volunteers, offer critical support for family caregivers, especially those caring for homebound older adults. Successful implementation requires stakeholder-informed co-design. This study aimed to establish expert consensus on a screening-guided, volunteer-supported in-home respite service model.
methodsWe conducted a modified online Delphi study to co-design the service model. A panel of 17 experts, including international researchers and Hong Kong-based NGO practitioners, participated in two Delphi rounds. Participants rated the model across four domains (appropriateness, completeness, clarity, and applicability) using 9-point Likert scale, with consensus defined as ≥ 75% of ratings ≥ 7. Qualitative feedback was analyzed using thematical analysis.
resultsThe final model incorporates a structured 4-level risk triage and needs assessment process to guide volunteer matching and services provision within a collaborative framework. Moderate overall consensus was achieved after two Delphi rounds, with strong endorsement for the model's clarity and appropriateness. However, significant divergence emerged among stakeholder subgroups, reflecting tensions between methodological rigor and practical feasibility. The model was perceived as feasible and acceptable for supporting family caregivers. The co-design process underscored the importance of stakeholder engagement in tailoring services to local community needs.
conclusionThis study presents a co-designed, risk-triaged, volunteer-supported in-home respite service model that aligns with ageing in place policies and addresses growing caregiver support needs in ageing societies. By integrating international research perspectives and local practice-based expertise, and by transparently documenting consensus and divergence, this work offers actionable insights for developing, adapting, and scaling respite care services internationally. Future research should evaluate the model's generalizability, long-term outcomes, and sustainability across diverse populations and settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.