ReviewVeterinary surgery : VS2026
Surgical limb-sparing in veterinary medicine: A review of existing techniques in dogs.
Review in Veterinary surgery : VS, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Modular Revision of a Failed Patient-Specific 3D-Printed Scapulo-Humeral Endoprosthesis in a Dog with Proximal Humeral Osteosarcoma: First Clinical Communication.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Surgical limb-sparing in veterinary medicine: A review of existing techniques in dogs.Veterinary surgery : VS · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Surgical limb-sparing in veterinary medicine can be defined as an intervention aimed at preserving limb function when a bone abnormality is present, namely neoplasia or a non-repairable fracture, and the affected segment of that bone needs to be removed and, most often, replaced. In some cases, the affected segment of bone is treated and reimplanted. It is mostly prevalent in the context of local tumor control while preserving limb function in veterinary surgical oncology but has also been employed for comminuted fracture repair. Importantly, this review focuses on neoplasia and non-repairable fractures wherein the bones were normal prior to the pathology and the non-affected segments of bone remain normal in the face of the pathology. Several techniques have been reported and vary based on a number of factors such as anatomic location of the pathology and method of addressing the defect created by removal of the affected bone segment. Limb-sparing techniques have been documented to have comparable survival times to limb amputation but can be fraught with mechanical and biological complications, requiring intensive long-term care and client compliance with treatment regimens. The most common complications are infection, mechanical failure, and local recurrence. Decreasing the risk of complication is the driving force for research in the field of limb sparing in dogs. The aim of this review was to compile the existing literature on surgical limb-sparing in dogs with the intent to guide clinical decision-making and inform further research on limb-sparing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.