ArticleCureus2025
From Therapeutic Refusal to Gynecological Emergency: A Case Report on a Long-Standing Uterine Prolapse.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Uterine prolapse is a type of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) that corresponds to the herniation with inferior displacement of the middle/apical compartment, in which the uterus descends from its normal position into or beyond the vaginal canal due to the weakening of the pelvic floor support structures. Its presentation can range from mild and asymptomatic forms to voluminous prolapse with functional impact and associated complications. This case illustrates a situation sparsely documented in the literature: the prolonged evolution of a uterine prolapse in a woman with multiple comorbidities, monitored in primary healthcare, who had previously refused corrective surgery in 2019. A 70-year-old woman, with a clinical history of one gestation and one eutocic delivery, menopause at 54 years (no hormone replacement therapy (HRT)), arterial hypertension, ischemic stroke (no identified sequelae), dyslipidemia, and obesity, was diagnosed with uterine prolapse since 2015. In July 2025, during a routine consultation and after direct questioning, she reported worsening symptoms due to increased exteriorization of the prolapse and episodes of scant abnormal uterine bleeding. Gynecological examination revealed a complete uterine prolapse (stage IV), non-reducible, with cervical erosion and active bleeding. Reduction was attempted without success. Local compression was applied, and she was referred to the gynecology emergency department, where, upon re-evaluation, she no longer presented active bleeding. Manual reduction of the uterine prolapse was performed, which recurred immediately upon standing. She was discharged with a referral back to her family physician, with instructions for referral to the outpatient gynecology clinic. At the outpatient gynecology clinic, she again refused surgery, opting for the placement of an 85 mm pessary. Thus, this case highlights the importance of longitudinal follow-up, objective examination, and active listening in general and family medicine, especially in patients with multiple comorbidities and previously postponed therapeutic decisions. Timely action in the face of warning signs and coordination with hospital care are essential to ensure safety and continuity of care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.