ArticleInternational medical case reports journal2025
Challenges in Determining Chorionicity and Diagnosing Selective Fetal Growth Restriction in Multifetal Pregnancies with Suspected Twin-Twin Transfusion Syndrome: A Case Report.
Article in International medical case reports journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Chorionicity is a key determinant of perinatal outcomes in twin pregnancies, with monochorionic gestations carrying greater risks due to complications such as twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS) and selective fetal growth restriction (sFGR). Although first-trimester ultrasound can determine chorionicity with near-perfect accuracy, assessment becomes less reliable in late gestation, increasing the risk of misclassification. Such diagnostic errors may lead to inappropriate management strategies, particularly when distinguishing between TTTS and sFGR, which require different clinical approaches. Case Presentation: A 38-year-old woman underwent routine antenatal assessment at 34-35 weeks' gestation, where ultrasound suggested a monochorionic diamniotic pregnancy with suspected TTTS based on the presence of T-sign and discordant amniotic fluid volumes. The diagnostic turning point occurred at delivery, when postnatal evaluation revealed a dichorionic diamniotic placenta, clarifying that the findings were consistent with sFGR rather than TTTS. The first neonate weighed 2610 g with a normally sized placenta (20 × 20×2 cm), while the second weighed 510 g with a markedly smaller placenta (10 × 10×1.5 cm). According to the Delphi criteria, the diagnosis of sFGR was confirmed, as the smaller twin had an estimated fetal weight below the 10th percentile and intertwin weight discordance exceeded 25%. Conclusion: This case illustrates how late-gestation assessment of chorionicity can lead to diagnostic misclassification, resulting in management strategies that may not align with the underlying pathology. Early and regular ultrasound surveillance-ideally beginning in the first trimester and continued every 2-4 weeks-remains essential for accurate diagnosis and appropriate monitoring of complications such as TTTS and sFGR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.