ArticleFrontiers in aging2025
Impact of multicomponent home-based exercise on fear of falling in older people with a history of falls: insights from the GAITCARE project.
Article in Frontiers in aging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: To compare the effectiveness of an 8-week multicomponent exercise program delivered at home with digital support versus conventional in-person hospital exercise sessions in reducing FOF. Materials and methods: The GAITCARE project is a multicenter quasi-experimental trial in three hospitals. Participants were assigned by hospital to either: (1) VIVIFIL App group-individualized daily home exercise with remote supervision; or (2) In person group-face to face exercise at hospital day-care units. The primary outcome was FOF measured by the Short Falls Efficacy Scale-International (Short FES-I). Secondary outcomes included adherence and app satisfaction. Results: 127 participants were included (64 in App group, 63 in-person group), aged 70-93 (mean 82.36). FOF (SFES-I) was present in 68.3% of the in-person group and 54.7% of the App group. The 8-week intervention reduced FOF scores in both groups, reaching statistical significance only in the in-person group. However, the App group also showed a clinically relevant reduction (∼20%) despite starting with slightly lower baseline FOF, suggesting potential benefits of remote delivery. The in-person group showed higher adherence at weeks 4, 8, and 12 (follow-up). Baseline physical activity influenced adherence, with sedentary participants showing lower adherence. Digital delivery with remote supervision showed good feasibility and was generally well accepted by participants. Conclusion: FOF is prevalent in older adults with falls and can be significantly reduced by face-to-face group exercise, which also achieves higher adherence. Enhancements in telematic applications are necessary to improve adherence in digital interventions targeting FOF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.