ReviewCureus2025
Integration of NANDA International Nursing Diagnoses Into Italian Operational Procedures During the Digital Transition: A Narrative Review (2015-2024).
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recovery-Oriented Care Planning in Mental Healthcare Services: A Combined Concept Analysis and Scoping Review.International journal of mental health nursing · 2026Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The digital transformation of the Italian National Health Service (NHS), accelerated by the National Recovery and Resilience Plan, requires the adoption of standardized terminology to ensure semantic interoperability and the measurability of care. This review analyzes the state of integration of NANDA International (NANDA-I) nursing diagnoses into hospital and community operational procedures in Italy from 2015 to 2024. A narrative review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. A systematic search on PubMed, CINAHL, and Scopus yielded 54 selected sources, including legislative acts and peer-reviewed studies. Methodological quality was rigorously appraised using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool, applying a strict inclusion threshold of ≥60% to ensure robustness of the evidence. Thematic analysis of the retrieved records was conducted using NVivo 14 (Lumivero, Burlington, MA, USA) to identify recurring implementation patterns. The analysis reveals a heterogeneous implementation landscape. Northern regions (e.g., Emilia-Romagna, Tuscany) have successfully embedded NANDA-I into Electronic Health Records through regional mandates, whereas Southern regions face infrastructural challenges. Evidence confirms that standardized taxonomies improve diagnostic accuracy, patient safety outcomes (specifically fall prevention and heart failure management), and care continuity. The integration of NANDA-I represents a strategic asset for the digital evolution of the NHS. Future efforts must focus on mandatory education and national interoperability standards (SNOMED-CT mapping) to bridge the digital divide.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.