ArticleFrontiers in sports and active living2025
Risks for eating disorder in ultra-endurance athletes and the role of training volume: a cross-sectional study.
Article in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Characterized by prolonged physical activity, ultra-endurance sports (UES) have attracted increasing popularity. Though moderate exercise can confer mental health benefits, the effects of extreme training volumes remain unclear. Instead, emerging research suggests a link between high training loads and increased psychiatric vulnerabilities, including for eating disorders (ED). Consequently, this study aimed to investigate trends in ED risk in a sample of ultra-endurance athletes (UEA) and the relationship to training volumes. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was administered among UEA using the Eating Attitudes Test-26 (EAT-26), alongside gathering demographic data and information on training hours. Athletes were categorized into three training volume groups: <10 h, 10-20 h, and >20 h per week. Statistical tests, including ANOVA, Mann-Whitney Results: Of the Conclusion: There was a significant association between high training volumes and increased ED risk among this UEA sample, suggesting a need for greater awareness of psychiatric vulnerabilities in endurance athletes. Given the growing popularity of UES, better education on the risks associated with high training volumes may be necessary to promote healthier training practices, underpinned by further research into its physiological and psychological consequences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.