Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41451157›Full record

ArticleCraniomaxillofacial trauma & reconstruction2025

Injury Patterns and Physiologic Risk Stratification in Facial Trauma Patients with Orbital Fractures: A National Trauma Database Analysis.

Turki Bin Mahfoz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Craniomaxillofacial trauma & reconstruction, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Turki Bin MahfozDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), Riyadh 13317-4233, Saudi Arabia; tmmahfoz@imamu.edu.sa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0252-7247

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough orbital fractures are common in trauma care, age-specific mechanisms and admission physiology-based risk stratification have not been systematically characterized. This study aimed to identify age-mechanism interaction patterns and develop an admission-based physiological risk score for orbital fracture patients.

methodsThis retrospective cohort study analyzed 41,464 adult orbital fracture patients from the National Trauma Data Bank (2018-2020). A three-component physiological risk score was developed using admission vital signs: severe hypotension (<90 mmHg, 2 points), tachycardia (>100 bpm, 1 point), and severe traumatic brain injury (GCS ≤ 8, 1 point). Risk stratification performance was validated against composite adverse outcomes.

resultsDistinct age-mechanism patterns emerged: 74.0% of elderly patients (≥65 years) sustained falls, while young adults demonstrated a bimodal distribution with motor vehicle crashes (31.2%) and violence (28.4%). Violence-related injuries occurred in younger patients (40.3 vs. 55.0 years) but had lower injury severity scores (10.0 vs. 14.4) and mortality (2.8% vs. 5.2%) than accidental mechanisms. High-/critical-risk patients (8.4% of the cohort) had 16.2% mortality versus 2.1% in stable patients. Complex facial injuries demonstrated 11-fold higher mortality (7.7% vs. 0.7%). The physiologic risk score achieved AUC 0.79 (95% CI: 0.78-0.80).

conclusionsAge-mechanism interactions revealed distinct bimodal injury patterns in young adults. Admission physiologic parameters effectively identify 8.4% of patients requiring intensive resources, while violence-related injuries paradoxically demonstrate better outcomes than accidental mechanisms.

Indexed as

age factorsinjury mechanismsorbital fracturesrisk stratificationtrauma registry

Identifiers

PMID41451157
PMCPMC12731463

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.