ReviewFrontiers in neurology2025
A narrative review of neuroprotective effects of remifentanil: from basic research to clinical practice.
Review in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Opioid receptor agonists constitute a class of pharmaceuticals that are extensively employed in anesthesia and analgesia. Remifentanil (RF), a novel synthetic opioid receptor agonist, is characterized by rapid onset of action and a short half-life, attributed to its unique pharmacokinetic profile. Clinically, RF is often used for total intravenous anesthesia. In recent years, RF has garnered more attention due to its potential organ-protective effects. This review aims to consolidate the existing evidence regarding the neuroprotective properties of RF, encompassing various levels ranging from molecular mechanisms to clinical applications. Experimental studies demonstrate that RF exerts protective effects in brain injury models, with its mechanisms being associated with the attenuation of apoptosis, oxidative stress, and neuroinflammation. In clinical practice, RF serves as a safe and effective analgesic regimen for patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI), those undergoing neurosurgical procedures, and individuals requiring endotracheal intubation; furthermore, it confers certain benefits to the recovery of patients' neurological function. Compared with fentanyl, RF is capable of reducing the incidence of delirium and postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) in patients. Moreover, remifentanil-induced hyperalgesia (RIH) during clinical administration is also discussed. In conclusion, RF is an anesthetic agent with significant neuroprotective potential. Future research should focus on elucidating its precise mechanism of action, optimizing clinical administration regimens, and exploring strategies in RIH management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.