Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41451696›Full record

SynthesisKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2026

Diagnostic evaluation and nonoperative management of Lisfranc injuries in athletes.

Scott D Semelsberger, Vanessa J Boggiano, Kassidy Webber, Julia M Balboni, James Butler, Arielle Richey Levine, IFASC Committee, Arianna L Gianakos

Abstract readConsensus StatementSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Diagnostic evaluation and nonoperative management of Lisfranc injuries in athletes.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Scott D SemelsbergerVirginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, Roanoke, Virginia, USA.
Vanessa J BoggianoSchool of Medicine, Lincoln Memorial University-Debusk College of Osteopathic Medicine, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA.
Kassidy WebberDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Community Memorial Healthcare, Ventura, California, USA.
Julia M BalboniSchool of Medicine, University of New England College of Osteopathic Medicine, Biddeford, Maine, USA.
James ButlerDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, USA.
Arielle Richey LevineDepartment of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
IFASC Committee
Arianna L GianakosDepartment of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8362-0752

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeLisfranc injuries present diagnostic and therapeutic challenges, particularly in elite athletes. The 2024 International Foot and Ankle Sports Consensus (IFASC) conducted an expert consensus and systematic review to establish evidence-based guidelines for the identification, classification and nonoperative management of these injuries in high-performance athletes.

methodsA modified Delphi process involving 32 international orthopaedic foot and ankle surgeons was conducted through four iterative survey rounds. Consensus thresholds were general (75%-85%), strong (86%-99%) and unanimous (100%). A concurrent systematic review was performed, encompassing clinical studies reporting outcomes for bony and ligament Lisfranc injuries in athletes.

resultsSeven consensus statements were unanimous, and six were strong. Diagnostic agreement included: (1) mechanism of injury via axial compression or twisting through a plantarflexed foot; (2) midfoot tenderness, pain with squeeze test and inability to bear weight; (3) bilateral weight-bearing radiographs for initial imaging and (4) computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for low-grade instability. Experts unanimously agreed that stable, nondisplaced injuries with intact ligaments on MRI may be managed nonoperatively with close monitoring. Systematic review findings demonstrated that ligament injuries predominated in male athletes, with 96.8% returning to sport at 2.8 versus 4.5 months for bony injuries.

conclusionLisfranc injuries in elite athletes remain challenging to diagnose and manage due to low-grade injury presentations and high return-to-play demands. This consensus and systematic review establish clear diagnostic and nonoperative treatment guidelines, emphasizing the importance of mechanism-based suspicion, thorough physical examination and early weight-bearing imaging. Stable, nondisplaced ligament injuries without significant MRI findings can be treated nonoperatively, with most athletes safely returning to sport within 6-10 weeks and minimal complications. In contrast, unstable or displaced injuries continue to require surgical fixation to restore alignment and prevent long-term dysfunction. Collectively, these findings provide a standardized framework that supports accurate diagnosis, evidence-based decision-making and efficient recovery in athletes with Lisfranc injuries. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V.

Indexed as

Athletic InjuriesFoot InjuriesLigaments, ArticularAthletesDelphi TechniqueHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingReturn to SportTomography, X-Ray ComputedathletefractureLisfrancmidfootsports

Identifiers

PMID41451696
PMCPMC13502431

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.