Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41452357›Full record

ArticleJournal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany)2025

NO/iNOS axis impact on glioma stem cells and temozolomide resistance.

Elsa Hincapié-Arias, Carolina Moughty-Cueto, Juan Manuel Zaloff-Dakoff, Alejandro Javier Mazzon, José Ignacio Gómez-Escalante, Martín Andrés Merenzon, Eduardo Seoane, Ezequiel Yasuda, Rodolfo José Recalde, Mariano Socolovsky and 4 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Elsa Hincapié-AriasUniversidad de Buenos Aires, Facultad de Medicina, Instituto de Oncología Ángel H. Roffo, Área de Investigación, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Carolina Moughty-CuetoUniversidad de Buenos Aires, Facultad de Medicina, Instituto de Oncología Ángel H. Roffo, Unidad de Neuro-Oncología, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Juan Manuel Zaloff-DakoffUniversidad de Buenos Aires, Facultad de Medicina, Instituto de Oncología Ángel H. Roffo, Unidad de Neuro-Oncología, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Alejandro Javier MazzonUniversidad de Buenos Aires, Facultad de Medicina, Instituto de Oncología Ángel H. Roffo, Unidad de Neuro-Oncología, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
José Ignacio Gómez-EscalanteUniversidad de Buenos Aires, Facultad de Medicina, Instituto de Oncología Ángel H. Roffo, Unidad de Anatomía Patológica, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Martín Andrés MerenzonHospital General de Agudos José María Ramos Mejía, Unidad de Neuro-Oncología, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Eduardo SeoaneHospital General de Agudos José María Ramos Mejía, Unidad de Neuro-Oncología, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Ezequiel YasudaUniversidad de Buenos Aires, Facultad de Medicina, Hospital de Clínicas ''José de San Martín'', Unidad de Neuro-Oncología, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Rodolfo José RecaldeUniversidad de Buenos Aires, Facultad de Medicina, Hospital de Clínicas ''José de San Martín'', Unidad de Neuro-Oncología, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Mariano SocolovskyUniversidad de Buenos Aires, Facultad de Medicina, Hospital de Clínicas ''José de San Martín'', Unidad de Neuro-Oncología, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Roberto Steven ZaninovichUniversidad de Buenos Aires, Facultad de Medicina, Hospital de Clínicas ''José de San Martín'', Unidad de Neuro-Oncología, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Marcela Solange VillaverdeUniversidad de Buenos Aires, Facultad de Medicina, Instituto de Oncología Ángel H. Roffo, Área de Investigación, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Denise BelgoroskyUniversidad de Buenos Aires, Facultad de Medicina, Instituto de Oncología Ángel H. Roffo, Área de Investigación, Buenos Aires, Argentina. dbelgorosky@institutoroffo.uba.ar.
Ana María EijánUniversidad de Buenos Aires, Facultad de Medicina, Instituto de Oncología Ángel H. Roffo, Área de Investigación, Buenos Aires, Argentina. grupoeijan@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2723-0194

Funding

Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica PICT-2020-01571Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica PICT START-UP 2020-00017Universidad de Buenos Aires PIDAE 2025-5181Universidad de Buenos Aires UBACyT 20720190100005BA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glioblastoma (GB), the most aggressive brain tumor invariably recurs despite conventional treatment (surgery, chemotherapy with temozolomide (TMZ), radiotherapy), a phenomenon linked to glioma stem cells (GSC). This study demonstrates that inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS)-derived nitric oxide (NO) sustains the GSC niche and contributes to TMZ resistance. In silico analysis of 695 glioma samples from The Cancer Genome Atlas showed that higher iNOS expression correlates with poor patient survival. In vitro, GSC-enriched cultures (spheres) from GB cell lines (LN229, U87, U251, GL26) exhibited elevated pluripotency (Nestin gene expression), iNOS expression and NO levels threefold higher than more differentiated cell cultures (2D and 3D-spheroids). The iNOS inhibitor S-methylisothiourea (SMT) effectively reduced NO production. Sequential treatment with TMZ followed by TMZ + SMT more effectively reduced viability in 2D and 3D-spheroids growth compared to TMZ alone. In GSC enriched spheres, SMT decreased GSC frequency and growth, and combined TMZ + SMT showed enhanced reduction. Primary human glioma cultures (n = 11) expressed iNOS and their GSC spheres formation efficiency was reduced by SMT. These findings suggest that iNOS/NO axis is critical for GSC maintenance and TMZ resistance. Sequential TMZ followed by iNOS inhibition shows promise as a therapeutic strategy against GB recurrence by targeting GSCs. KEY MESSAGES: Elevated iNOS expression correlates with poor glioma prognosis markers. Temozolomide acts on more differentiated glioma cells and enriches stem cells. iNOS inhibition reduces the stem cell niche, enhancing TMZ sensitization.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, NeoplasmGliomaNeoplastic Stem CellsNitric Oxide Synthase Type IITemozolomideAnimalsAntineoplastic Agents, AlkylatingBrain NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorEnzyme InhibitorsHumansIsothiuroniumMiceNitric OxideSpheroids, CellularStem Cell NicheAntineoplastic Agents, AlkylatingEnzyme InhibitorsIsothiuroniumNitric OxideNitric Oxide Synthase Type IINOS2 protein, humanS-methylisothiopseudouroniumTemozolomideGlioma stem cellInducible nitric oxide synthaseNitric oxideTemozolomide resistance

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.