ReviewPediatric radiology2026
Artificial intelligence and pediatric imaging data: ethical strategies for learning and collaboration.
Review in Pediatric radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial Intelligence for Diagnosis, Risk Stratification, and Prognosis of Neuroblastoma - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Current oncology reports · 2026Pooled it
- Prompting the future: artificial intelligence in pediatric radiology.Pediatric radiology · 2026Article
- Perspectives on the future of artificial intelligence in paediatric radiology.Pediatric radiology · 2026Article
- One square at a time: adding value on the paediatric radiology chessboard.Pediatric radiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in pediatric radiology requires an interdisciplinary approach that prioritizes transparency, accountability and collaboration between developers, clinicians and regulatory bodies. The development of AI models that are specifically designed to analyze pediatric imaging data has the potential to improve diagnosis and treatment outcomes, but it also requires careful consideration of the ethical implications. This review highlights the importance of the unique challenges posed by AI in pediatric imaging data, including regulatory hurdles, bias mitigation and the need for human oversight. Facing this situation, pediatric radiologists need to be equipped with the skills and knowledge to critically evaluate AI outputs and address potential biases and limitations. This requires ongoing education and training in pediatric radiology as well as AI. The integration of AI in pediatric radiology requires a collaborative approach that involves not only developers and clinicians but also patients and families. Ultimately, the integration of AI in pediatric imaging needs to be a coordinated effort from all stakeholders to prioritize the long-term safety and health of the young patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41452364What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.