ArticleFrontiers of medicine2025
Risk prediction and therapeutic targets for incident pulmonary hypertension: a large-scale proteomic profiling and Mendelian randomization study.
Article in Frontiers of medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We aimed to identify plasma proteins associated with pulmonary hypertension (PH) risk, discover potential therapeutic targets for PH, and develop and validate a protein-based prediction model. The development cohort included 38 499 UK Biobank participants from England (split into 70% training and 30% testing set), while the validation cohort comprised 5021 participants from Scotland and Wales. LASSO regression was used to identify predictive proteins in the training set, with model performance assessed using Harrell's C-index, net reclassification improvement (NRI), and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) in the testing and validation cohorts. We developed a 30-protein risk score, identifying RGMA and NPC2 as causal factors and potential therapeutic targets. Endothelin-1 emerged as a central hub in the protein-protein interaction network. In the testing set, the PH protein risk score demonstrated superior predictive performance for PH risk (C-index = 0.873, 95% CI 0.846-0.900) compared to a basic model (age and sex; C-index = 0.761, 95% CI 0.726-0.795) and a clinical risk model (C-index = 0.843, 95% CI 0.815-0.870). Adding the PH protein risk score to clinical risk factors significantly improved 10-year PH risk reclassification (NRI = 0.258, IDI = 0.053). Similar performance was observed in the validation cohort. These findings underscore the clinical utility of protein biomarkers for PH risk assessment and identify RGMA and NPC2 as promising therapeutic targets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41454079What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.