ArticleJournal of cancer survivorship : research and practice2025
Subjective memory impairment in long-term breast cancer survivors-associated factors and comparisons to controls from the HUNT study.
Article in Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeWe examined subjective memory impairment (SMI) in a nationwide sample of pre- and postmenopausal long-term (≥ 5 years after diagnosis) breast cancer survivors (BCSs) compared to similar aged population-based controls and explored risk factors for SMI in BCSs.
methodsWe studied 1,288 BCSs and 15,461 controls aged 40-74 years who completed questionnaires including the Metamemory Questionnaire assessing SMI, divided into short-term (STM)-, and long-term (LTM) memory, and SMI total score. Menopausal status was approximated using age.
resultsMean age of BCSs was 60 years at survey 8 years after diagnosis, and 58% were premenopausal at diagnosis. STM, LTM and SMI total mean scores were significantly worse among pre- compared to postmenopausal BCSs with Cohen's d < 0.50 Among both pre- and postmenopausal women, the means of all three SMI scores were significantly worse in BCSs compared to controls, with Cohen's d 0.52-0.73 in premenopausal and Cohen's d ≤ 0.20 in postmenopausal BCSs. In univariate analyses, chemo- and endocrine therapy, comorbidity, physical inactivity, BMI, neuroticism, fatigue, pain, and mental distress were statistically significantly associated with worse SMI total score in BCSs. Higher levels of fatigue and depressive symptoms remained significantly associated with SMI in multivariable analyses.
conclusionsLong-term, premenopausal BCSs have worse SMI scores than both postmenopausal BCSs and similar aged controls. Multiple, potentially modifiable factors were significantly associated with SMI in both groups of BCSs. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: SMI appears more prominent in premenopausal long-term BCSs compared to controls. Several modifiable factors are associated with SMI in both pre- and postmenopausal BCSs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41454094What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.