Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41454173›Full record

ReviewNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2025

From lesion detection to outcome prediction: artificial intelligence and deep learning applications in multiple sclerosis.

Akanksha Prasad, Anuradha Sharma

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Akanksha PrasadDepartment of Biotechnology, School of Bioengineering and Biosciences, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara, Punjab, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-6645-9255
Anuradha SharmaDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetic Engineering, School of Bioengineering and Biosciences, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara, Punjab, India. s.anuradha21@ymail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2693-4760

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) and its deep-learning (DL) sub-field are reshaping the multiple sclerosis (MS) landscape from image acquisition to drug discovery. This narrative review synthesizes recently published evidence that links technical advances with clinical need. Deep-learning platforms now match experienced neuroradiologists, detecting more than 14% of cortical lesions and generating synthetic contrast-enhanced MR images that eliminate the use of gadolinium. Multimodal prognostic engines with MRI, optical-coherence tomography, serum neurofilament light chain (NfL) and smartphone-based gait metrics can predict relapse or conversion to the secondary-progressive phase months and sometimes years before standard review. Multi-omics classifiers further help refine care by identifying which non-responders to natalizumab have a greater than 80 percent probability of not responding to the therapy; and patient-facing apps turn daily symptom logs into patient-specific advice that reduces unplanned visits and raises quality of life scores. In the lab, generative models compress the design cycle of new compounds, and knowledge-graph analytics identify new indications for existing drugs. Yet gains remain uneven: LMIC clinics lack computational infrastructure, demographic bias skews performance, and regulatory frameworks trail algorithmic evolution. In essence, cloud-optimized deployment, participatory data sharing, explainable outputs and shared liability are necessary for ethical, equitable integration. When these pillars align, AI will move from just being an accessory to an essential scaffold, enabling genuinely anticipatory, precision MS care all while increasing the understanding of disease biology.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceDeep LearningMultiple SclerosisHumansPrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning ModelsArtificial intelligenceDeep learningDigital biomarkersMultiple sclerosisPrognostic modelling

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.