ArticleIndian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology2025
Predicting non-compliance to pancreatic enzyme supplementation therapy in chronic pancreatitis: A machine learning-based approach.
Article in Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence in chronic and autoimmune pancreatitis: diagnosis, prognosis, and personalized management.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesChronic pancreatitis results in pancreatic exocrine insufficiency (PEI), which is treated with pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy (PERT). Despite the clinical benefits, non-compliance to PERT is a frequent problem. Our study aimed at (a) identifying predictors of non-compliance to PERT using machine learning (ML) algorithms and (b) analyzing patient-reported reasons for non-compliance to PERT.
methodsA prospective observational study was conducted at a high-volume tertiary care center on two independent cohorts of chronic pancreatitis patients on PERT. In Cohort 1 (1057 patients screened), we used ML algorithms to identify predictors of non-compliance to PERT. The best ML model based on performance metrics was chosen for Shapley Additive explanations (SHAP) analysis. In Cohort 2 (465 patients screened), we conducted detailed interviews to understand patient-reported reasons for non-compliance.
resultsIn Cohort 1 (751 patients analyzed; median age, 37.5 years; males, 73.1%; idiopathic, 61.9%), 166 (22.1%) patients were non-compliant to PERT. Extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) exhibited the highest accuracy (area under the curve, AUC = 0.91). The strongest predictors of non-compliance based on SHAP were disease duration, age, fat-restricted diet, rural residence and educational status. A non-compliance (NC) score was developed based on SHAP. In Cohort 2 (129 patients analyzed; mean age, 36 years; males, 72.1%; idiopathic, 52.3%), high treatment costs (34.1%), negligence (19.4%) and adverse effects (10.9%) were the most reported reasons for non-compliance.
conclusionsThis study identifies predictors of non-compliance to PERT (disease duration, age, fat-restricted diet, rural habitat, undergraduate education status) in patients with chronic pancreatitis using machine-learning algorithms. The NC score can be a useful tool to identify patients at risk for non-compliance, who can be subjected to targeted counselling. The NC score needs to be validated in large, independent, multi-centre cohorts of patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41454217What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.