ArticleBMC cancer2025
Evaluation indicators for bladder dysfunction in Chinese patients following cervical cancer surgery: a Delphi study based on nursing outcomes classification.
Article in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to develop scientific and standard evaluation indicators related to bladder dysfunction after cervical cancer surgery, providing a reference for clinical nurses in China.
methodsAccording to the framework of the Nursing Outcomes Classification (3rd edition), nursing outcomes and indicators were screened through a literature review and clinical investigation. Subsequently, the Delphi expert consultation method was used to revise and determine the core outcomes and indicators.
resultsA total of 28 experts participated in the correspondence consultation. The valid recovery rates for the two rounds were 93.33% and 100%, respectively. The expert authority coefficient averaged 0.90, and the Kendall harmony coefficient ranged between 0.216 and 0.352 (P < 0.05). Finally, 7 core nursing outcomes and 57 indicators were identified for patients with bladder dysfunction after cervical cancer surgery.
conclusionThe revised core nursing outcomes and indicators are valuable for developing specialized nursing measures and evaluating nursing outcomes for patients with bladder dysfunction after cervical cancer surgery. Additionally, they provide a reference for promoting standardized nursing language in China.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.