Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41454233›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2025

Evaluation indicators for bladder dysfunction in Chinese patients following cervical cancer surgery: a Delphi study based on nursing outcomes classification.

Xianhong Han, Ruiqing Di, Huanjun Zhang, Bingqian Zhou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xianhong HanGynaecology Department, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450052, China.
Ruiqing DiNursing Department, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, No.1 Jianshe East Road, Erqi District, Zhengzhou, Henan Province, 450052, China. Sunshine__1227@126.com.
Huanjun ZhangGynaecology Department, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450052, China.
Bingqian ZhouGynaecology Department, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450052, China.

Funding

First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University IRB2022-KY-0379-002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aimed to develop scientific and standard evaluation indicators related to bladder dysfunction after cervical cancer surgery, providing a reference for clinical nurses in China.

methodsAccording to the framework of the Nursing Outcomes Classification (3rd edition), nursing outcomes and indicators were screened through a literature review and clinical investigation. Subsequently, the Delphi expert consultation method was used to revise and determine the core outcomes and indicators.

resultsA total of 28 experts participated in the correspondence consultation. The valid recovery rates for the two rounds were 93.33% and 100%, respectively. The expert authority coefficient averaged 0.90, and the Kendall harmony coefficient ranged between 0.216 and 0.352 (P < 0.05). Finally, 7 core nursing outcomes and 57 indicators were identified for patients with bladder dysfunction after cervical cancer surgery.

conclusionThe revised core nursing outcomes and indicators are valuable for developing specialized nursing measures and evaluating nursing outcomes for patients with bladder dysfunction after cervical cancer surgery. Additionally, they provide a reference for promoting standardized nursing language in China.

Indexed as

Postoperative ComplicationsUrinary Bladder DiseasesUterine Cervical NeoplasmsAdultChinaDelphi TechniqueEast Asian PeopleFemaleHumansMiddle AgedUrinary BladderBladder dysfunctionCervical cancerNursing outcomeValuation index system

Identifiers

PMID41454233
PMCPMC12849444

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.