Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41454255›Full record

Observational studyBMC primary care2025

"How old do you feel?" Subjective age as a tool to enhance communication in primary care: a pilot observational study.

Robert D Hoffman, Galia Zacay, Joseph Azuri, Tal Hakmon Aronson, Lilach Eyal Waldman, Tanju Yilmazer, Limor Adler

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Robert D HoffmanDepartment of Family Medicine, Gray Faculty of Medical & Health Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel. Hoffman5@netvision.net.il.ORCID 0000-0002-3053-835X
Galia ZacayDepartment of Family Medicine, Gray Faculty of Medical & Health Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Joseph AzuriDepartment of Family Medicine, Gray Faculty of Medical & Health Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Tal Hakmon AronsonDepartment of Family Medicine, Maccabi Healthcare Services, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Lilach Eyal WaldmanDepartment of Family Medicine, Maccabi Healthcare Services, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Tanju YilmazerIzmir Gazi Hospital Home Care Services, Izmir, Turkey.
Limor AdlerDepartment of Family Medicine, Gray Faculty of Medical & Health Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSubjective age has been linked to health outcomes, including functional decline and increased mortality risk. However, its utility in primary care settings remains underexplored. This study aimed to evaluate whether the question “How old do you feel?” could enhance physician-patient communication.

methodsIn this pilot observational study, thirteen primary care physicians (PCPs) asked 194 patients aged 50 and older the question “How old do you feel?” during clinical encounters. Following each encounter, PCPs completed a questionnaire to assess the impact of the question on the consultation. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, and univariate analysis was performed with a mixed-effects logistic regression model to identify factors influencing physicians’ perceptions of the question’s utility. We also evaluated their free-text responses to understand their perceptions of this question.

resultsPCPs reported positive experiences, with 74% of consultations leading to further discussions, and 80% of PCPs felt the question improved their understanding of the patient. 62% believed the question benefited the patient. Factors such as physician age, experience, and patient multimorbidity were significantly associated with positive perceptions of the question’s utility. DISCUSSION: This study suggests that asking “How old do you feel?” can enhance communication between PCPs and patients, providing valuable insights into patients’ overall well-being. This question may help identify vulnerable patients and improve care. Future studies should explore its broader applicability and long-term effects in diverse primary care settings to assess its potential as a standard tool in clinical practice.

Indexed as

CommunicationPhysician-Patient RelationsPhysicians, Primary CarePrimary Health CareAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsAttitude of Health PersonnelFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsSurveys and QuestionnairesChronological ageCommunicationPrimary careSubjective age

Identifiers

PMID41454255
PMCPMC12853589

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.