Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41454500›Full record

ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2025

COVID-19 on Elective Surgery Outcomes in a Brazilian Tertiary Hospital: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Dilson Palhares Ferreira, Cláudia Vicari Bolognani, Luana Argollo Souza Fernandes, Matheus Serwy Fiuza de Morais, Lucas Lourenço Santos Souza, Mariah Vicari Bolognani, Giovana Alves Madureira, Levy Aniceto Santana, Fábio Ferreira Amorim

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Dilson Palhares FerreiraGraduation Program in Health Sciences, University of Brasília (UnB), Brasília, DF, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4430-4984
Cláudia Vicari BolognaniGraduation Program in Health Sciences, Escola Superior de Ciências da Saúde, Brasília, DF, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-1521-475X
Luana Argollo Souza FernandesMedical School, Escola Superior de Ciências da Saúde, Brasília, DF, Brazil.
Matheus Serwy Fiuza de MoraisMedical School, Centro Universitário do Planalto Central Apparecido dos Santos (UNICEPLAC), Brasília, DF, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-5523-2667
Lucas Lourenço Santos SouzaMedical School, Escola Superior de Ciências da Saúde, Brasília, DF, Brazil.
Mariah Vicari BolognaniMedical School, Centro Universitário do Planalto Central Apparecido dos Santos (UNICEPLAC), Brasília, DF, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-6389-0037
Giovana Alves MadureiraMedical School, Escola Superior de Ciências da Saúde, Brasília, DF, Brazil.
Levy Aniceto SantanaGraduation Program in Health Sciences, Escola Superior de Ciências da Saúde, Brasília, DF, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-7743-4892
Fábio Ferreira AmorimGraduation Program in Health Sciences, University of Brasília (UnB), Brasília, DF, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-0929-5733

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND The COVID-19 pandemic significantly disrupted elective surgical services worldwide, especially in resource-limited settings, raising concerns about surgical safety and care quality. This study compared postoperative hospital mortality, day-of-surgery cancellations, and surgical reintervention rates before, during, and after the COVID-19 pandemic among elective surgeries scheduled at a tertiary public hospital in the Federal District, Brazil. MATERIAL AND METHODS This retrospective cohort study included all consecutive adult surgeries scheduled at a tertiary public hospital in the Federal District between January 2018 and December 2022. Trends in hospital mortality, day-of-surgery cancellations, and surgical reintervention rates were evaluated across the pre-pandemic (March 2018-February 2020), lockdown (March 2020-August 2020), and post-lockdown (September 2020-February 2022) periods using the Cochran-Armitage test for trend and multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS Among 8806 scheduled surgeries, 5482 (62.3%) were elective. The number of elective procedures significantly decreased during the lockdown (P<0.001). Day-of-surgery cancellations decreased independently during the lockdown compared with the pre-pandemic period (odds ratio [OR]: 0.556; 95% CI: 0.448-0.691; P<0.001) and showed no significant difference with the post-lockdown period (OR: 0.828; 95% CI: 0.650-1.055; P=0.126). Surgical reintervention rates were unchanged during lockdown (OR: 0.888; 95% CI: 0.662-1.192; P=0.274) but declined significantly in the post-lockdown period (OR: 0.534; 95%CI: 0.390-0.733; P<0.001). No significant differences were found in postoperative hospital mortality across the 3 periods (P=0.847). CONCLUSIONS Reductions in cancellations and reinterventions, without an increase in mortality, were observed in the provision of elective surgical care during the pandemic.

Indexed as

COVID-19Elective Surgical ProceduresAdultAgedBrazilFemaleHospital MortalityHumansMaleMiddle AgedPandemicsQuarantineReoperationRetrospective StudiesTertiary Care CentersYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID41454500
PMCPMC12790134

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.