ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2025
COVID-19 on Elective Surgery Outcomes in a Brazilian Tertiary Hospital: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND The COVID-19 pandemic significantly disrupted elective surgical services worldwide, especially in resource-limited settings, raising concerns about surgical safety and care quality. This study compared postoperative hospital mortality, day-of-surgery cancellations, and surgical reintervention rates before, during, and after the COVID-19 pandemic among elective surgeries scheduled at a tertiary public hospital in the Federal District, Brazil. MATERIAL AND METHODS This retrospective cohort study included all consecutive adult surgeries scheduled at a tertiary public hospital in the Federal District between January 2018 and December 2022. Trends in hospital mortality, day-of-surgery cancellations, and surgical reintervention rates were evaluated across the pre-pandemic (March 2018-February 2020), lockdown (March 2020-August 2020), and post-lockdown (September 2020-February 2022) periods using the Cochran-Armitage test for trend and multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS Among 8806 scheduled surgeries, 5482 (62.3%) were elective. The number of elective procedures significantly decreased during the lockdown (P<0.001). Day-of-surgery cancellations decreased independently during the lockdown compared with the pre-pandemic period (odds ratio [OR]: 0.556; 95% CI: 0.448-0.691; P<0.001) and showed no significant difference with the post-lockdown period (OR: 0.828; 95% CI: 0.650-1.055; P=0.126). Surgical reintervention rates were unchanged during lockdown (OR: 0.888; 95% CI: 0.662-1.192; P=0.274) but declined significantly in the post-lockdown period (OR: 0.534; 95%CI: 0.390-0.733; P<0.001). No significant differences were found in postoperative hospital mortality across the 3 periods (P=0.847). CONCLUSIONS Reductions in cancellations and reinterventions, without an increase in mortality, were observed in the provision of elective surgical care during the pandemic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.