Trial reportThe European journal of neuroscience2025
Feasibility and Safety of a Single-Session of Transcutaneous Cervical Magnetic Stimulation, taVNS, and iTBS on Heart Rate Variability, Safety, and Pain Modulation.
Trial report in The European journal of neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Feasibility and Safety of a Single-Session of Transcutaneous Cervical Magnetic Stimulation, taVNS, and iTBS on Heart Rate Variability, Safety, and Pain Modulation.The European journal of neuroscience · 2025Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The autonomic nervous system (ANS) plays a crucial role in maintaining homeostasis, and its dysfunction is linked to numerous clinical conditions, including chronic pain. Neuromodulatory interventions such as transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS), transcutaneous cervical magnetic stimulation (tCMS), and intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) have been investigated for their potential to modulate autonomic responses and pain perception. However, the efficacy and safety of these techniques remain unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of a single session of neuromodulatory stimulation in modulating autonomic function and pain processing in healthy individuals. A double-blind, randomized, crossover clinical trial was conducted with 22 healthy participants, each undergoing four intervention sessions (taVNS, tCMS, iTBS, and Sham-taVNS) in randomized order, with a washout period of at least 36 h between sessions. Heart rate variability (HRV) and conditioned pain modulation (CPM) were assessed pre- and post-intervention using a Polar H10 cardiac sensor and a digital pressure algometer. Adverse effects were recorded immediately after each session. No statistically significant differences were observed in HRV or CPM outcomes across active stimulation conditions when compared to Sham. Among the techniques evaluated, tCMS presented the most favorable safety profile, with fewer reported adverse effects relative to iTBS and taVNS. The absence of significant modulation effects suggests that a single session may be insufficient to induce detectable changes in autonomic or pain processing. However, the tolerability and safety of tCMS indicate its potential for future research involving repeated sessions and clinical populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.