ArticleProbiotics and antimicrobial proteins2026
Assessment of Protective Role of Different Probiotic Strains against Bacterial and Endotoxin-Induced Sepsis in a Mouse Model.
Article in Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sepsis caused by Gram-negative bacteria such as Escherichia coli and Salmonella enterica is a major contributor to global morbidity and mortality. This study investigated the protective effects of four human milk-derived probiotic strains, Staphylococcus hominis, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Streptococcus salivarius, and Streptococcus lactarius, in murine models of pathogen- and lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced sepsis. Mice received probiotic pre-treatment before challenge with LPS, E. coli, or Salmonella enterica typhimurium. Clinical signs, survival, body weight, gross and histopathological lesions, serum biochemical markers, fecal bacterial load, and intestinal cytokine gene expression (TNF-α, IL-6) were recorded. Pathogen- and LPS-challenged groups showed high mortality, significant weight loss, marked intestinal pathology, elevated serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), urea, and creatinine, increased fecal pathogen counts, and upregulated TNF-α and IL-6 expression. Probiotic pre-treatment improved survival, preserved body weight, reduced lesion severity, normalized biochemical parameters, lowered fecal pathogen load, and downregulated pro-inflammatory cytokines. Among the tested strains, Strep. lactarius provided the most consistent protection in E. coli and LPS models, whereas Strep. Salivarius was most effective against Salmonella-induced sepsis. The results indicate that specific human milk-derived probiotics can reduce systemic inflammation and organ injury in Gram-negative bacterial sepsis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41455008What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.