ArticleCommunications medicine2025
Compact vision language models enable efficient and interpretable optical coherence tomography through layer-specific multimodal learning.
Article in Communications medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTranslating the intricate anatomical signatures of retinal disease from optical coherence tomography (OCT) B-scans into clear, accurate clinical narratives demands algorithms that seamlessly fuse visual features with domain expertise.
methodsWe curated a multimodal dataset of 40,000 OCT B-scans from public repositories and private clinical cohorts, each paired with expert-validated summaries spanning six conditions: diabetic macular edema, diabetic retinopathy, geographic atrophy, drusen, choroidal neovascularization, and healthy retina. We introduce LO-VLM, a compact (247M parameter) vision-language model (VLM) that infuses anatomical guidance into both encoder and decoder for free-form summary generation and multiclass disease classification. Benchmarking against state-of-the-art RetinaVLM, LLaVA-Med, and a ViT vision only model demonstrates superior performance.
resultsIn a blinded evaluation by three board certified retina specialists, LO-VLM narratives achieves a mean = 8.5 (standard deviation = 1.15) out of 10, compared to a mean = 5.5 (standard 32 deviation = 1.13) for RetinaVLM (p < 0.0001). In quantitative evaluations, LO-VLM achieves an SBERT similarity of 80.3% and a BERTScore F1 of 71.5%, representing improvements of 8.2% and 28.8% over specialized VLM baselines. For disease classification, LO-VLM reaches 96% accuracy (F1 = 96%), outperforming ViT by 13% and exceeding medical VLM benchmarks by over 62% (p < 0.05).
conclusionsBy reconciling interpretability with computational efficiency, LO-VLM establishes a paradigm for efficient AI models in OCT interpretation.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.