Trial reportStem cell research & therapy2025
Safety and efficacy of allogeneic umbilical cord blood cells and erythropoietin combination therapy in patients with subacute stroke.
Trial report in Stem cell research & therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04013646 (Safety and Efficacy of Combined Administration of Erythropoietin in Umbilical Cord Blood Therapy for Stroke Patients), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Safety and Efficacy of Combined Administration of Erythropoietin in Umbilical Cord Blood Therapy for Stroke Patients
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCell therapy has been proposed as a promising treatment for neurological recovery in patients with stroke. However, a strategy to enhance its efficacy is needed, as its clinical benefits have not yet been demonstrated in clinical trials. This study evaluated the efficacy of combination therapy using allogeneic umbilical cord blood (UCB), a relatively safe therapeutic cell source, and recombinant human erythropoietin (rhEPO) in patients with subacute stroke.
methodsIn this double-blind, randomised controlled trial, we enrolled patients with subacute stroke one to nine months after stroke onset. The patients were divided into three groups: UCB + EPO, UCB, and control. Immune compatibility-matched UCB was intravenously infused once, and rhEPO was administered five times. Safety was evaluated according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 5.0), while efficacy was assessed based on changes in activities of daily living, motor and cognitive functions, brain imaging findings, and electroencephalography performed at six months after baseline.
resultsA total of fifteen patients (59.0 ± 10.9 years) were included, with consisting of five patients in each group with comparable demographic data and functional parameters at baseline. Adverse events did not indicate any harmful effects of UCB or rhEPO. After all patients completed the final functional evaluation the UCB + EPO group showed significantly better outcomes than the control group in terms of the total Functional Independent Measure (FIM) (Δ15.00[12.50, 24.50] vs. Δ0.00[-13.00, 3.00], P = 0.009), FIM motor subscale (Δ14.00[10.00, 18.50] vs. Δ13.00[0.50, 3.50], P = 0.009), and Geriatric Depression Scale (Δ-3.00[-5.00, -2.00] vs. Δ6.00 [-1.00, 18.50], P = 0.016) scores. The UCB group showed a marginally non-significant improvement over the control group, without statistical differences in most outcome measures. The brain imaging findings also supported the functional recovery-related effects of UCB therapy.
conclusionIn conclusion, rhEPO can enhance the efficacy of UCB cells in patients with subacute stroke, without causing harmful effects. This exploratory finding may provide evidence for the potential use of UCB + EPO combination therapy for neurological recovery following stroke. Trial registration URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04013646 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.