ArticleClinical and translational science2026
Global Investigation of Clinical Implementation Strategies for DPYD Testing to Guide Fluoropyrimidine Therapy.
Article in Clinical and translational science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Impact of Upfront DihydroPyrimidine Dehydrogenase (DPD) Testing on the Therapeutic Management of Patients Scheduled for 5-FU.Cancer medicine · 2026Observational
- Global Investigation of Clinical Implementation Strategies for DPYD Testing to Guide Fluoropyrimidine Therapy.Clinical and translational science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fluoropyrimidines are a vital component of chemotherapy regimens. Deleterious DPYD variants reduce activity of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase, the rate-limiting enzyme of fluoropyrimidine catabolism, resulting in reduced fluoropyrimidine clearance and elevated risk of life-threatening toxicities. DPYD genotype-guided fluoropyrimidine therapy can mitigate the risk of severe life-threatening toxicities, but adoption of testing globally has been limited. We developed a 91-item survey investigating global DPYD implementation strategies to gain insight into common practices and successful strategies. The survey was disseminated to Pharmacogenomics Global Research Network Implementation Working Group members consisting of 54 health care sites across 15 countries. Survey responses were received from 28 sites (52%) across 9 countries. Over 80% of sites implemented, or planned to implement, a preemptive testing strategy (i.e., before a fluoropyrimidine is administered) leveraging the electronic health record (EHR) to disseminate DPYD results to providers. All sites created infrastructure to support DPYD testing (e.g., order sets, EHR decision support), but 70% of sites indicated reliance on clinicians to remember test ordering. Only 2 sites reported high DPYD testing rates (> 75%) among patients planned to receive a fluoropyrimidine. Most sites (57%) used in-house clinical laboratories that tested for the majority of DPYD Tier 1 variants. Among sites that had implemented DPYD testing, the median turnaround time was 10 days. Few sites indicated that a high percentage (> 75%) of DPYD results were returned before fluoropyrimidine administration. Our results suggest that additional implementation strategies are needed, addressing barriers and facilitators of DPYD testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.