ArticleDrug and alcohol dependence reports2026
Geographic differences in buprenorphine and methadone prescribing for surgical patients with opioid use disorder.
Article in Drug and alcohol dependence reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Patients with opioid use disorder (OUD) frequently present for surgery while receiving medications for OUD (MOUD), typically buprenorphine or methadone. This study evaluated MOUD use among surgical patients with OUD in a health-system spanning both urban and rural areas in Maine; a predominantly rural state with a significant opioid crisis. Methods: We retrospectively identified adult surgical patients with OUD admitted to MaineHealth hospitals from 2014 to 2023 who were receiving MOUD prior to the day of surgery. Demographics and clinical characteristics were collected; rural designation was determined using Rural-Urban Commuting Area codes. The primary outcome was the temporal trend in proportion of surgical patients with OUD receiving methadone versus buprenorphine prior to admission. Temporal trends and geographic differences were compared using chi-square tests (p < 0.05). Results: Of 2099 surgical patients on MOUD, 71.4 % received buprenorphine and 28.6 % methadone. Overall, rural patients were more likely to receive buprenorphine than urban patients (75.1 % vs. 68.5 %) (p < 0.001). Buprenorphine prescribing increased from 52.0 % to 84.2 % in rural areas and from 59.3 % to 72.9 % in urban areas, with corresponding declines in methadone use (both p < 0.05). Conclusions: Temporal trends showed a significant shift in MOUD prescribing over the study period, with buprenorphine use increasing and methadone use declining in rural and urban populations. Although both medications are considered safe in hospitalized and surgical patients, perioperative management remains inconsistent. Further work is needed to evaluate how these prescribing trends influence clinical outcomes and ensure perioperative protocols support continuity of care for patients with OUD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.