Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41458078›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in aging2025

Age and liver transplantation: a key factor in clinical outcomes? single center study in Argentina.

Marco Santillán Pazmiño, Paula Constanza Arriola Benitez, Maria Florencia Fernandez, Silvina Yantorno, Valeria Descalzi, Franco Daniel Tarditti, María Lucia Novellis, Juan Cruz Fasolo, Martín Rumbo, Stefan Günther Tullius and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in aging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Marco Santillán PazmiñoInstituto de Medicina Traslacional, Trasplante y Bioingeniería (IMeTTyB- CONICET- Universidad Favaloro), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Paula Constanza Arriola BenitezCancer Immunobiology Laboratory, Facultad de Ciencias Biomédicas, Instituto de Investigaciones en Medicina Traslacional (IIMT), CONICET-Universidad Austral, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Maria Florencia FernandezCirugía General, Hepatología y Trasplante Hepático, Hospital Universitario Fundación Favaloro, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Silvina YantornoCirugía General, Hepatología y Trasplante Hepático, Hospital Universitario Fundación Favaloro, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Valeria DescalziCirugía General, Hepatología y Trasplante Hepático, Hospital Universitario Fundación Favaloro, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Franco Daniel TardittiInstituto de Medicina Traslacional, Trasplante y Bioingeniería (IMeTTyB- CONICET- Universidad Favaloro), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
María Lucia NovellisCirugía General, Hepatología y Trasplante Hepático, Hospital Universitario Fundación Favaloro, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Juan Cruz FasoloCirugía General, Hepatología y Trasplante Hepático, Hospital Universitario Fundación Favaloro, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Martín RumboInstituto de Estudios Inmunológicos y Fisiopatológicos, IIFP, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, CONICET, La Plata, Argentina.
Stefan Günther TulliusDivision of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
Pablo Barros SchelottoCirugía General, Hepatología y Trasplante Hepático, Hospital Universitario Fundación Favaloro, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Gabriel Eduardo GondolesiInstituto de Medicina Traslacional, Trasplante y Bioingeniería (IMeTTyB- CONICET- Universidad Favaloro), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
María Virginia GentiliniInstituto de Medicina Traslacional, Trasplante y Bioingeniería (IMeTTyB- CONICET- Universidad Favaloro), Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Growing demand for liver transplantation (LTx) has increased the use of elderly donors. In Argentina, however, data on the clinical impact of donor age on post-transplant outcomes remain limited. Objective: To evaluate the effect of donor age on clinical, functional, and molecular outcomes after LTx at Hospital Universitario Fundación Favaloro Buenos Aires, Argentina. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of 494 LTx conducted between 2009 and 2020. Patients were stratified into two age groups: 18-59 years (Younger) and ≥60 years (Elderly). Overall and graft survival (OS and GS) were assessed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses adjusted for recipient age, donor age, recipient gender, donor gender, transplant year, MELD score, disease etiology, donor BMI, DRI, CIT, WIT, Total Bilirubin (TBIL) and INR. Early postoperative complications including early allograft dysfunction (EAD) and early renal replacement therapy (RRT) were evaluated. Post-transplant liver function was assessed by routine biochemical tests. Gene expression of pro-inflammatory and senescence markers was quantified by qRT-PCR, and lipofuscin deposition was measured using ImageJ. Results: After applying exclusion criteria, 267 LTx were included (Younger donors: n = 222; Elderly donors: n = 45). Recipients of elderly donor grafts showed significantly lower OS and GS (p < 0.05). In the multivariable analysis, donor age and TBIL remained independent predictors of GS, whereas donor age, recipient age, and TBIL were associated with OS. In contrast, neither the incidence of EAD nor early RRT differed between recipients of elderly versus young donor grafts. Early postoperative biochemical profiles were also similar between groups, with no significant differences in ALT, AST, ALP, or TBIL levels. Molecular analyses demonstrated that elderly donor livers exhibited significantly higher expressions of IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α, p21 and CCND1, Elderly donor livers displayed higher baseline lipofuscin accumulation (p < 0.05), consistent with age-associated cellular senescence, and trends toward higher rejection rates. Conclusion: Donor liver aging, characterized by increased inflammatory and senescence signatures, is associated with reduced patient and graft survival. These findings underscore the clinical relevance of considering donor biological age, beyond chronological age, in organ allocation and selection strategies.

Indexed as

agingelderly donorliver transplantorgan allocationsenesenceyounger donor

Identifiers

PMID41458078
PMCPMC12739379

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.