ArticleFrontiers in neurology2025
Machine learning-driven risk prediction of delayed cerebral ischemia after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage using peripheral inflammatory markers.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Delayed Cerebral Ischemia and Functional Outcome in Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: The Role of CNS Infection-Related Parameters.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- A machine learning approach to predict treatment response in myofascial pain patients receiving masseter trigger point injections.BMC oral health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) remains a leading cause of secondary neurological deterioration and mortality after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). Accumulating evidence highlights the pivotal role of systemic inflammation in the pathogenesis of DCI, with peripheral inflammatory markers showing potential as early indicators. However, the predictive performance of individual biomarkers is limited. By leveraging machine learning (ML) techniques, it is possible to integrate heterogeneous inflammatory signals and model complex nonlinear relationships to improve individualized risk prediction. Methods and materials: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 562 aSAH patients admitted to a single tertiary center. Clinical, radiographic, and laboratory data-including peripheral inflammatory indices-were extracted from electronic medical records. The Boruta algorithm was applied for feature selection. Six ML models were developed and compared: logistic regression, neural network, random forest, support vector machine, gradient boosting machine (GBM), and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost). Model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, F1 score, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Results: Among the six models, the neural network demonstrated the best balance between discrimination and calibration, with an AUC of 0.826 in the training cohort and 0.808 in the internal testing cohort. Eight predictors were included in the final model: Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), Hunt-Hess grade, modified Fisher score, prognostic nutritional index (PNI), neutrophil-to-albumin ratio (NAR), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte platelet ratio (NLPR), C-reactive protein-to-lymphocyte ratio (CLR), and procalcitonin. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis revealed Hunt-Hess grade and procalcitonin as top contributors. Conclusion: This study proposes a machine learning-based risk prediction tool for DCI after aSAH, built from routinely available inflammatory and clinical variables. The model demonstrated strong discriminative and calibration performance and provides a clinically interpretable, preoperative decision-support tool. Prospective multicenter validation is warranted to assess generalizability and facilitate clinical translation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.