Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41458113›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in neurology2025

Mapping self-awareness of cancer-related cognitive impairment: a scoping review of evidence, methods, and neurobiological correlates.

Davide Spinetti, Mariaines Orzelleca

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Davide Spinetti *Department of General Psychology (DPG), University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Mariaines Orzelleca *Department of General Psychology (DPG), University of Padua, Padua, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Cancer-related cognitive impairment (CRCI) is a frequent and distressing side effect among cancer survivors. While many patients report persistent cognitive difficulties, a notable discrepancy often exists between subjective complaints and objective performance on neuropsychological testing. This gap raises critical questions about self-awareness and metacognitive insight in the context of CRCI. Despite the clinical relevance of this phenomenon, conceptualized as anosognosia in other neurological conditions, its presence in oncology remains insufficiently explored. Objective: This scoping review aims to map the existing literature on self-awareness of cognitive impairment in cancer survivors, with a focus on studies examining the discrepancy between subjective and objective cognition, the methodologies used to assess awareness, and the clinical and theoretical implications of impaired metacognition in this population. Methods: A systematic search was conducted on PubMed for articles published between 2000 and 2025. Inclusion criteria comprised peer-reviewed studies involving adult cancer survivors that investigated subjective and/or objective cognitive functioning, and addressed aspects of self-awareness, metacognitive monitoring, or anosognosia. Studies were screened, selected, and charted following PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Results: Forty six studies met the inclusion criteria. Most reported a weak or inconsistent correlation between self-reported and objectively measured cognition. A minority employed formal tools to assess metacognitive accuracy or insight. Methodological heterogeneity and a lack of consensus in terminology (e.g., "awareness," "insight," "complaints") limited cross-study comparisons. Only a small number of articles conceptualized this discrepancy in relation to anosognosia or broader models of self-awareness. Factors such as age, mood symptoms, fatigue, and neurobiological correlates (e.g., alterations in the default mode network) were identified as potential moderators of impaired awareness. Conclusion: Despite growing evidence of subjective-objective cognitive discrepancies in cancer survivors, the construct of self-awareness remains under-theorized and inconsistently measured in the literature. There is an urgent need for standardization of terms and tools, and for theoretically informed approaches to capture metacognitive impairment in this context. Greater clarity in this domain may inform more tailored interventions, improve survivorship care, and advance the neuropsychological understanding of CRCI.

Indexed as

anosognosiacancer survivorCRCImetacognitionneuroimagingneuropsychologyscoping review

Identifiers

PMID41458113
PMCPMC12738308

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.