ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Development, validation, and web deployment of a rebleeding risk prediction model for acute non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding in a Chinese population.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Acute non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (ANVUGIB) is a common life-threatening emergency. Despite advances in endoscopic hemostasis, the 7-day rebleeding rate remains as high as 15-30%. Existing risk assessment tools show limited performance in Chinese populations, underscoring the need for a high-precision model tailored to local patients. Objective: To develop, validate, and deploy an individualized model for predicting 7-day rebleeding risk in Chinese patients with ANVUGIB using early clinical information. Methods: We retrospectively included 818 patients with ANVUGIB treated at the General Hospital of Central Theater Command between January 2020 and December 2023, randomly divided into a training cohort ( Results: Five independent predictors were identified: syncope, pulse rate, red cell distribution width, serum albumin, and bowel sounds. The prediction model incorporating these variables achieved areas under the curve (AUCs) of 0.843 (95% CI 0.784-0.903), 0.833 (95% CI 0.742-0.924), and 0.825 (95% CI 0.700-0.950) in the training, internal validation, and external validation cohorts, respectively. Calibration plots and decision curve analysis confirmed good consistency and clinical utility. Conclusion: We developed and validated a 7-day rebleeding risk prediction model for ANVUGIB in a Chinese emergency department population. The model outperformed existing scoring systems, and deployment as a Shiny-based web tool enables early risk identification and individualized decision-making in emergency care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.