ArticleFrontiers in network physiology2025
Coronary artery disease prediction using Bayesian-optimized support vector machine with feature selection.
Article in Frontiers in network physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Cardiovascular diseases, particularly Coronary Artery Disease (CAD), remain a leading cause of mortality worldwide. Invasive angiography, while accurate, is costly and risky. This study proposes a non-invasive, interpretable CAD prediction framework using the Z-Alizadeh Sani dataset. Methods: A hybrid decision tree-AdaBoost method is employed to select 30 clinically relevant features. To prevent data leakage, SMOTE oversampling is applied exclusively within each training fold of a 10-fold cross-validation pipeline. The Support Vector Machine (SVM) model is optimized using Bayesian hyperparameter tuning and compared against Sea Lion Optimization Algorithm (SLOA) and grid search. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis is utilized to interpret the feature contributions. Results: The SVM_Bayesian model achieves 97.67% accuracy, 95.45% precision, 100.00% sensitivity, 97.67% F1-score, and 99.00% AUC, outperforming logistic regression (93.02% accuracy, 92.68% F1-score), random forest (95.45% accuracy, 93.33% F1-score), standard SVM (77.00% accuracy), and SLOA-optimized SVM (93.02% accuracy). Ablation studies and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests confirm the statistical superiority of the proposed model. Discussion: SHAP analysis reveals clinically meaningful feature contributions (e.g., Typical Chest Pain, Age, EFTTE). 95% bootstrap confidence intervals and temporal generalization on an independent test set ensure robustness and prevent overfitting. Future work includes validation on external real-world datasets. This framework provides a transparent, generalizable, and clinically actionable tool for CAD risk stratification, aligned with the principles of network physiology by focusing on interconnected cardiovascular features in predicting systemic disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.