ReviewCureus2025
Early Diagnosis of Diabetic Neuropathy: A Review of Current Diagnostic Tests.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Targeting the gut microbiota: emerging strategies to enhance healing of diabetic foot ulcers.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diabetes mellitus is a common chronic condition frequently complicated by distal sensorimotor polyneuropathy (DSPN), a major contributor to pain, foot ulceration, and limb loss. Despite its impact, DSPN often remains undetected until there is significant loss of protective sensation. Routine screening practices tend to identify more advanced stages of neuropathy, offering limited sensitivity for early disease. Earlier diagnosis could substantially improve outcomes by enabling timely intervention and optimised glycaemic control. A range of diagnostic modalities has been investigated for the early detection of DSPN, particularly those assessing small fibre function. Quantitative sensory testing (QST) is non-invasive but limited by subjectivity and variability. More objective measures include skin biopsy for intraepidermal nerve fibre density (IENFD) and corneal confocal microscopy (CCM). Both techniques provide valuable structural information about small fibre integrity; however, CCM has practical advantages as it is non-invasive, repeatable, and suitable for both clinical and research settings. Sudomotor tests such as Neuropad are simple to administer and may detect subclinical neuropathy, though specificity is modest. The absence of a universally accepted reference standard for small fibre neuropathy complicates the comparative evaluation of diagnostic tools. This review evaluates multiple modalities that show promise for earlier detection of DSPN. Standardisation of methodology and consensus on diagnostic criteria are essential to enable the integration of these tools into clinical practice and improve long-term patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.