Evidence mapPaperPMID 41458830Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Early Diagnosis of Diabetic Neuropathy: A Review of Current Diagnostic Tests.

Minnan Al-Khafaji, Vanessa Otti

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Minnan Al-KhafajiOphthalmology, The Royal London Hospital, London, GBR.
Vanessa OttiBiomedical Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diabetes mellitus is a common chronic condition frequently complicated by distal sensorimotor polyneuropathy (DSPN), a major contributor to pain, foot ulceration, and limb loss. Despite its impact, DSPN often remains undetected until there is significant loss of protective sensation. Routine screening practices tend to identify more advanced stages of neuropathy, offering limited sensitivity for early disease. Earlier diagnosis could substantially improve outcomes by enabling timely intervention and optimised glycaemic control. A range of diagnostic modalities has been investigated for the early detection of DSPN, particularly those assessing small fibre function. Quantitative sensory testing (QST) is non-invasive but limited by subjectivity and variability. More objective measures include skin biopsy for intraepidermal nerve fibre density (IENFD) and corneal confocal microscopy (CCM). Both techniques provide valuable structural information about small fibre integrity; however, CCM has practical advantages as it is non-invasive, repeatable, and suitable for both clinical and research settings. Sudomotor tests such as Neuropad are simple to administer and may detect subclinical neuropathy, though specificity is modest. The absence of a universally accepted reference standard for small fibre neuropathy complicates the comparative evaluation of diagnostic tools. This review evaluates multiple modalities that show promise for earlier detection of DSPN. Standardisation of methodology and consensus on diagnostic criteria are essential to enable the integration of these tools into clinical practice and improve long-term patient outcomes.

Indexed as

corneal confocal microscopydiabetes screeningdiabetic neuropathydiagnostic testsdistal sensorimotor polyneuropathyearly diagnosisreview

Identifiers

PMID41458830
PMCPMC12742893

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.