SynthesisFrontiers in nutrition2025
Intermittent fasting improves metabolic outcomes in metabolic syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis with GRADE evaluation.
Synthesis in Frontiers in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Intermittent Fasting Amplifies Gut-Endocrine Axis Responses to Senna alexandrina Supplementation in Obese Rats.Molecular nutrition & food research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Previous studies have demonstrated that intermittent fasting (IF) has garnered scientific attention and gained recognition for its beneficial effects on metabolic outcomes. However, the results are inconsistent. Accordingly, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effect of fasting on glycemic control, lipid profile, and inflammatory markers. Methods: Databases such as PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Scopus, and Web of Science were used to retrieve relevant studies published until September 2025. The quality of the included studies was evaluated using the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias 2 (RoB2) tool. Moreover, the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was employed to evaluate the quality of evidence. Results: A total of 10 studies, involving 701 individuals, were included in the current meta-analysis. The combined effect of various types of fasting significantly reduced fasting blood sugar (FBS) [standard mean difference (SMD) = -0.51; 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.81, -0.20; Conclusion: The findings suggest that intermittent fasting may have favorable effects on the metabolic panel, specifically, FBS, insulin, HOMA-IR, (HbA1c), LDL-C, and IL-6 levels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.