ReviewJournal of clinical and experimental dentistry2025
Frequency TMJ disc displacements.
Review in Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Discrepancy between centric relation and therapeutic position in TMJ disc displacement: a case report.BMC oral health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disorders are characterized by alterations in joint structure and function, with disc displacement being one of the most prevalent pathological findings. The frequency, typology, and clinical correlates of these displacements, particularly with regard to intra-articular effusion, remain insufficiently explored. Material and Methods: The retrospective study included 244 MRI examinations of patients with TMJ disorders. Imaging was performed using standardized protocols on 1.5 T MRI scanners. Disc position was classified according to established radiological criteria. The prevalence and distribution of various disc displacement types, as well as the presence and degree of joint effusion, were systematically evaluated. Results: Anterior disc displacement was identified in 9.84% (right) and 8.61% (left) TMJ of unilateral cases, and in 17.21% (right) and 16.80% (left) TMJ of bilateral cases. Partial anterior disc displacement was observed in 8.61-10.66% of unilateral cases and 15.16-15.57% of bilateral cases. Rotational displacements were found in 6.15-6.56% of unilateral cases and 12.70-13.11% of bilateral cases, while lateral/medial and posterior displacements ranged from 0.41% to 3.69%. A normal disc position was present in 20.90-22.95% of joints. Joint effusion was most often recorded in cases of anterior and partial anterior displacements, predominantly minimal (2.9-5.3%) or small (1.2-2.9%) in degree. In most cases of lateral, posterior, and rotational displacement, as well as with normal disc position, effusion was absent. Conclusions: Anterior disc displacement is the most prevalent TMJ pathology among symptomatic patients, with a frequency up to 17.2% in bilateral cases. Effusion is most closely associated with anterior and partial anterior displacements but is typically minimal or absent. These findings support a predominantly mechanical, rather than inflammatory, etiology for disc displacement in this patient population.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.