Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41459219›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in microbiology2025

Probiotics in epilepsy treatment: a meta-analysis of efficacy and safety.

Kang Tan, Yunfeng Yu, Pei Liu, Pengfei Jiang, Yi Liu, Bidan Lou, Qinghua Peng

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kang Tan *School of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, China.
Yunfeng Yu *School of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, China.
Pei Liu *School of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, China.
Pengfei JiangQuzhou Hospital Ophthalmology Center, Zhejiang Medical and Health University, Quzhou, China.
Yi LiuSchool of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, China.
Bidan LouAcupuncture-Tuina-Rehabilitation Department, The First Hospital of Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, China.
Qinghua PengSchool of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Interest in probiotics for managing neurological disorders has grown recently. Methods: Eight public databases were searched for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published until May 31, 2025. Eligible studies were screened based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Basic characteristics and outcome data were extracted from the included studies, and the risk of bias was assessed. Meta-analyses, sensitivity analyses, and publication bias evaluations were performed using RevMan 5.3 software. The quality of evidence was rated using GRADEpro GDT. Results: Six RCTs involving 656 patients were included. Compared with the AED group, the probiotic combination group had significantly higher clinical efficacy rate (relative risk [RR] 1.16, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.09 to 1.24, Conclusion: Probiotics improved seizure activity, relative power in certain EEG frequency bands, and intestinal barrier function without increasing the incidence of adverse reactions, supporting their feasibility as complementary treatment for epilepsy. Limited sample size and methodological necessitate further validation. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251079172, Identifier CRD420251079172.

Indexed as

antiepileptic drugsepilepsymeta-analysisprobioticssystematic review

Identifiers

PMID41459219
PMCPMC12740239

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.