ReviewFrontiers in immunology2025
Conceptual quantitative systems pharmacology framework for supporting clinical trial design in organ-specific autoimmune and rare diseases.
Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Neural-immune-cancer crosstalk in pancreatic cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Organ-specific autoimmune and rare inflammatory diseases present significant challenges for clinical trial design due to profound patient heterogeneity, small population sizes, and complex tissue-specific pathophysiology. To address these hurdles, this study proposes a conceptual Quantitative Systems Pharmacology (QSP) framework tailored to support end-to-end clinical trial design in this high-need area. The framework integrates multi-source data, including preclinical, omics, and real-world evidence, via Bayesian methods to inform prior distributions for model parameters. A core multiscale mechanistic model links intracellular signaling, cellular dynamics, and tissue-level pathology to simulate disease progression and drug effects. Virtual patient populations are generated by sampling from Bayesian posteriors, capturing real-world biological heterogeneity. These cohorts then undergo in silico clinical trial simulations to evaluate and optimize key design elements, such as dosing regimens, endpoint selection, patient stratification, and adaptive strategies, prior to real-world implementation. By providing a structured, disease-agnostic workflow, the framework enables rational decision-making for dose optimization, biomarker identification, and patient enrichment. It addresses critical bottlenecks in drug development for these complex diseases, offering a powerful tool to de-risk trials and improve the efficiency and success rate of clinical development programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.