SynthesisOrthodontics & craniofacial research2026
Impact of Clear Aligners on the Temporomandibular Joint: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Orthodontics & craniofacial research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The temporomandibular joint (TMJ) may experience alterations during orthodontic treatments. Furthermore, gaps in the literature highlight a lack of robust evidence on the impact of clear aligner therapy (CAT) on the TMJ. This review aims to find the current evidence regarding the effects of CAT on the TMJ. Electronic searches were conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, LILACS, The Cochrane Library and ProQuest Theses and Dissertations. The eligibility followed PECOS: Permanent-dentition patients (P); CAT (E); CAT group baseline parameters (C); TMJ structural parameters (O). Data extraction included sample size, age, control group characteristics, assessed outcomes, evaluation tools and it periods and main results. Risk of bias was assessed with the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist and the ROBINS-E tool. Certainty of evidence was determined using the GRADE approach. Of the 1490 references identified, only five met the eligibility criteria and were included. CAT was associated with dimensional alterations in the condyle volume and surface area, increased superior joint space and fossa depth and decreased condylar bone density. For condylar inclination or position, there are no significant changes. The certainty of evidence was low and very low, reasoned by studies design limitations and heterogeneity. Despite the lower number of studies and low evidence level, CAT seems to induce modest, predominantly increased changes in TMJ spaces and fossa depth, with insufficient clinical significance regarding if CAT effects on TMJ are positive or not. Future studies with standardised TMJ imaging are essential to establish more robust evidence. Trial Registration: PROSPERO CRD42024547484.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.