ReviewEuropean journal of pediatrics2025
Integrated follow-up of former extremely preterm infants: how to do it?
Review in European journal of pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Community-Based Follow-Up After NICU Discharge: A Practice-Focused Narrative Review of Nursing and Midwifery Care for Preterm Infants.Pediatric reports · 2026Review
- Can slow and (un)steady still win the race? A narrative review of developmental gait characteristics and clinical implications in children born preterm.European journal of pediatrics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Extremely preterm (EP) infants, defined as those born before 28 weeks of gestation or weighing less than 1000 g, face high rates of long-term complications despite improved neonatal survival. This narrative review summarizes current evidence and international consensus on the post-discharge follow-up of EP infants, with emphasis on neurodevelopment, somatic growth, pulmonary and sensory outcomes, and family-centered care. Key domains include early identification of cerebral palsy using neurological assessments such as the General Movements and Hammersmith scales, cognitive monitoring with standardized tools (e.g., Bayley Scales), nutritional and growth surveillance beyond anthropometrics, structured respiratory evaluations including immunoprophylaxis, and timely screening for vision and hearing deficits. In addition, the integration of caregiver-reported outcomes and mental health screening is essential to tailor follow-up strategies and support parental wellbeing. Models of care vary globally, from tertiary-based programs to hybrid and community-integrated approaches, highlighting the need for adaptable, interdisciplinary frameworks. Coordinated long-term follow-up that extends into early childhood is vital to reduce disparities and optimize functional outcomes in this vulnerable population. What is Known: • Extremely preterm infants are at high risk for long-term neurodevelopmental, respiratory, nutritional, and sensory complications, even when neonatal survival improves. • Neurodevelopmental tools such as the Bayley, General Movements, and Hammersmith Scales are widely used for early screening of cognitive and motor outcomes. What is New: • It highlights the importance of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in complementing clinical surveillance with caregiver perspectives. • It underscores the limitations of early assessments alone and supports extending developmental monitoring into the preschool and school-age years.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41460346What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.