ArticleJournal of neurology2025
Neuromodulation in Parkinson's disease with transcranial pulse stimulation: evidence of clinical efficacy and cortical oscillatory changes.
Article in Journal of neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Non-invasive neuromodulation techniques for cognitive impairment intervention.American journal of translational research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundParkinson's disease (PD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder for which current pharmacological treatments, while initially effective, often lead to long-term motor fluctuations and complications. Transcranial pulse stimulation (TPS) is a novel non-invasive neuromodulation technique that uses mechanical stimuli through shockwaves to induce neuroplasticity.
methodsThis open-label, single-arm pilot study enrolled 14 individuals with PD who received 12 TPS sessions over 4 weeks. Stimulation targeted motor and symptom-specific cortical regions. Outcomes were assessed across motor, non-motor domains, and EEG at baseline, after 3, 6, 9, and 12 sessions, and at 1-month follow-up.
resultsTPS produced significant and consistent improvements across different domains. After 12 TPS sessions, UPDRS total scores improved by 9.43 points (p < 0.001, Cohen's d = - 0.566), and UPDRS Part III improved by 4.93 points (p < 0.001, d = - 0.498). Non-motor symptom burden was reduced by 19.14 points (p = 0.014, d = - 0.754). Cognitive performance improved substantially, with a 7.28-point gain on the SCOPA-COG (p < 0.001, d = 1.161). Quality of life improved by 1.30 points on the PDQ-39 SI (p = 0.005, d = - 0.690), and depression symptoms by 3.43 points on the BDI-II (p = 0.008, d = - 0.644). Follow-up analyses demonstrated that all clinical effects were sustained one month after treatment.
conclusionTPS appears to induce clinically meaningful and lasting improvements across multiple domains in PD, accompanied by EEG changes that indicate enhanced neuroplasticity. However, due to the nature of this pilot open-label trial, these results should be interpreted as preliminary, hypothesis-generating findings that require confirmation in adequately sham-controlled randomized clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.