Observational studyPloS one2025
Epidemiology of early childhood weight change and concurrent undernutrition among African children: A sub-continental observational analysis.
Observational study in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEvidence on weight change among children under five in sub-Saharan Africa is limited, as is knowledge of its association with undernutrition status. This study assessed how early childhood weight change-categorised as acceleration, deceleration, or stable-following different birthweights (low, normal, or high) influences the risk of undernutrition in sub-Saharan African children.
methodsUsing data from 111,623 children across 33 sub-Saharan countries from recent Demographic and Health Surveys (2011-2022), weight trajectory was measured by SD score comparison for current age and birthweight. Survey-weighted logistic regression was used to estimate the odds of distinct weight changes, and of stunting, underweight, and wasting. We adjusted for individual child factors (e.g., age, sex, birth order), maternal factors (e.g., age, education, employment), household factors (e.g., family size, household wealth), and contextual factors (e.g., place of residence).
resultsAmong the 111,623 under-five children, 24.63% had accelerated weight change, 40.84% had decelerated weight change, 26.05% were stunted, 11.80% were underweight, and 5.54% were wasted. Of the 38,343 children with 'stable' weight progression, 20.14% were stunted, 5.49% were underweight, and 3.27% wasted. The odds of accelerated weight gain were approximately seventeen times higher among low birthweight infants (aOR = 16.92; 95% CI: 15.78 to 18.83), while the odds of decelerated weight change were about nineteen times higher among high birthweight infants (aOR = 18.53; 95% CI: 16.44 to 20.88), compared with those of normal birthweight. Children with normal birthweight who experienced decelerated weight change had highest odds of being underweight (aOR: 14.05; 95% CI: 12.72 to 15.52), followed by LBW infants with accelerated weight gain (aOR: 4.01; 95% CI: 3.48 to 4.62), and high birthweight infants with weight deceleration (aOR: 3.61; 95% CI: 3.11 to 4.17).
conclusionsEarly childhood growth disruptions, especially weight deceleration, are common in sub-Saharan African children. The complex relationship between birthweight, subsequent weight progression, and undernutrition underscores the need to address poverty to prevent growth disruptions and ensure comprehensive growth assessments during healthcare contact by infants to identify suboptimal growth and provide necessary support to address it.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.