ArticlePloS one2025
Sex-based differences in front crawl and butterfly sprint performance in age-group swimmers.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of Aqua Points Level on Speed, Efficiency, and Turn Performance in Youth Swimmers Aged 11-12 Years.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2026Article
- Network-based performance analysis of multidimensional performance characteristics in trained male youth combat athletes.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo identify the key variables influencing 50 m sprint performance in front crawl and butterfly strokes and determine the predominant predictors of sex-related performance differences in each technique in age-group swimmers.
methodsThirty national-level age-group swimmers (15 boys and 15 girls; age 13.5 ± 1.0 years) underwent assessments of anthropometry, biological maturation, neuromuscular performance (dynamic strength index of upper and lower limbs), anaerobic critical velocity, tethered swimming force, and stroke mechanics.
resultsMultivariate analyses revealed substantial sex differences (p < 0.05), with boys outperforming girls in upper-body force output and anaerobic critical velocity (AnCV). Boys showed a greater AnCV (1.54 vs. 1.45 m·s ⁻ ¹) and lower fatigue index (-8.52% in front crawl). Boys and girls had a 27.60 N front crawl force differential and 13.59 N butterfly force difference in the first 10 s of tethered swimming. Controlling for sex and biological maturity, the maximum explained variation (ƞ2) was found in front crawl tethered swimming force (47%), and butterfly lower limb neuromuscular performance (29%). In front crawl, total push-up peak force (diff: 215.44 N; 95% CI: 1.25 to 3.08; p < 0.001) and body height (diff: 0.08 cm; 95% CI: -1.82 to -0.28; p < 0.001) were key discriminators, while in butterfly, push-up force (diff: 215.44 N; 95% CI: 1.25 to 3.08; p < 0.001) and stroke index (diff: 0.54 m² ⋅ s ⁻ ¹; 95% CI: 1.04 to 2.79; p < 0.001) were the most effective predictors.
conclusionOur findings confirm the predictive ability of upper-limb neuromuscular performance and stroke efficiency in identifying sex-based differences in sprint swimming. The practical implications of these findings are substantial, offering a framework for coaches and sports scientists to improve procedures for training by focusing on technique- and sex-specific performance characteristics at critical stages of athletic development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.