ArticleJMIR research protocols2025
Generation of a Free-Living Ground-Truth Validation Dataset for Wearable Measures of Physical Activity, Sedentary Behavior, Sleep, and Heart Rate in Adults (OxWEARS): Protocol for a Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in JMIR research protocols, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Wearable devices enable continuous measurement of physical activity, sedentary behavior, sleep, and heart rate under free-living conditions. However, most validation studies rely on small, homogeneous samples; are conducted under laboratory conditions; or lack gold standard ground-truth measurements, limiting the generalizability and accuracy of derived metrics. There is a pressing need for open-access, large-scale, free-living validation datasets that include multisensor data from diverse body locations and participant demographics to aid in model development. Objective: The Oxford Wearable ECG, Activity, Circadian Rhythm, and Sleep Validation Study (OxWEARS) aims to (1) validate accelerometer-based measurement of physical behaviors across 5 body sites against annotated camera data; (2) validate measurements of sleep and sleep staging from 5 different body sites against polysomnography; (3) validate wrist-worn photoplethysmography heart rate measurements against chest-worn electrocardiogram; and (4) generate a comprehensive, annotated, and anonymized dataset for open-access research use. Methods: This cross-sectional study will recruit approximately 160 adults (aged ≥40 years) stratified by age, sex, and BMI from the Oxford BioBank. Over 3 days and 4 nights, participants will wear sensors on the wrists, chest, hip, thigh, and ankle. Ground-truth measures will be obtained from a chest electrocardiogram patch for heart rate, a first-person camera for activity annotation, an ankle-worn accelerometer for step count, and at-home polysomnography for sleep. An under-mattress sensor will collect measures of sleep, respiration rate, and bedtime, and a subjective sleep diary will also be obtained. Signals from different wear locations will be compared against the ground truth using precision, recall, F1-score, κ, and agreement metrics. Results: Recruitment commenced in November 2024, with 15 participants enrolled by May 2025. Overall, 50% of eligible adults contacted were happy to consent to the study, with excellent compliance with the protocol observed to date. Data collection is ongoing and expected to conclude in 2026, with the final annotated dataset made publicly available as soon as possible thereafter. Conclusions: The OxWEARS study will generate an openly accessible dataset containing more than 10,000 annotated hours from a stratified sample of adults. This will directly support scalable, generalizable human activity recognition efforts, while also enabling robust development and benchmarking of wearable-derived health metrics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.