ArticleScientific reports2025
Manual annotation based sentiment analysis of user feedback in health and wellness app reviews.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study examines end-user feedback on the Health and Wellness mobile health application, sourced from the play store, by integrating sentiment classification and linguistic intensity analysis to evaluate user perceptions. Comments are categorized into five distinct classes, ranging from highly positive (Class 5) to highly negative (Class 1), using keywords and linguistic patterns. The dataset comprises 20,651 rows, with 9063 highly positive comments, 5877 moderately positive comments, 1380 neutral comments, 298 moderately negative comments, and 4033 highly negative comments. To assess classification efficacy, several state-of-the-art algorithms were implemented, encompassing Support Vector Machines (SVM), Naive Bayes, ensemble-based classifiers (Decision Tree and Random Forest), and deep learning architectures (Convolutional neural networks, CNN). The experimental outcomes underscore the comparative advantage of these approaches in sentiment classification tasks, with CNN achieving the highest accuracy in detecting subtle contextual features. This analysis contributes to application design processes by providing insights into user interaction, satisfaction drivers and communication strategies for digital health platforms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.