ArticleScientific reports2025
Dose response of nafamostat mesylate for anticoagulation monitoring in pediatric critical care during continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nafamostat mesylate (NM) is increasingly used as an alternative anticoagulant during continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) in pediatric intensive care, especially when unfractionated heparin or regional citrate is contraindicated. However, evidence regarding optimal monitoring of its anticoagulant effects remains limited. This study aimed to investigate the association between NM infusion rate and coagulation parameters-specifically activated clotting time (ACT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT)-in critically ill pediatric patients receiving CVVHDF, and to examine how hepatic function and transfusion status may influence this relationship. In this retrospective study of 99 patients, we analyzed 340 matched data pairs of NM infusion orders and coagulation test results. Linear mixed-effects models revealed a significant positive correlation between NM infusion rate and aPTT (β = 8.54, P < 0.001), while no significant association was found with ACT. Subgroup analyses stratified by liver function and transfusion status consistently supported the association between NM and aPTT. Non-linear regression further suggested a dose-response pattern for aPTT, but not for ACT. These findings indicate that aPTT may be a more sensitive and reliable parameter than ACT for monitoring NM's anticoagulant effects in pediatric CVVHDF. The results challenge current ACT-based monitoring practices and highlight the need for prospective validation to refine anticoagulation strategies using NM in critically ill children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.