ArticleBMC surgery2025
Analysis of factors associated with the outcome of hospitalisation in patients with traumatic pelvic fracture combined with shock.
Article in BMC surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparing unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy versus percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for single-level lumbar disc herniation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo examine the determinants of hospitalisation outcomes in patients with traumatic pelvic fractures accompanied by shock through the establishment of a retrospective cohort study. analyseanalyse the influencing factors of hospitalisation.
methodsTo examine the factors influencing the outcome of hospitalisation treatment for patients with traumatic pelvic fracture combined with shock, we retrospectively analysed the clinical data of 134 patients in our hospital from July 2021 to July 2024. We classified the patients into survival and death groups based on the outcome of hospitalisation, gathered and compared the pertinent data of the research subjects, and performed logistic regression analysis for the items with differences. We classified.
resultsThe covariance analysis showed that there was no covariance among Glasgow Coma Score (GCS), Shock Index (SI), Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP), Blood Lactic Acid (Lac), and Fibrinogen (Fib) levels in 134 patients with traumatic pelvic fracture combined with shock, of whom 108 survived hospitalization (80.60%) and were included in the survival group, and 26 patients died (19.40%) and were included in the death group; Plotting the receiver operating curve (ROC) revealed that each of the factors above and the joint prediction of Area Under Curve (AUC) values were 0.689, 0.673, 0.832, 0.681, 0.670, and 0.930, respectively. The logistic regression equation also showed that GCS score, SI index, MAP, Lac, and Fib levels were all significant factors in the death of hospitalised patients with traumatic pelvic fracture combined with shock.
conclusionGCS score, SI index, MAP, Lac and Fib levels are all influential factors in the hospitalization outcome of patients with traumatic pelvic fracture combined with shock, and their joint prediction accuracy is high, and the clinic can combine the above factors to strengthen the risk monitoring, and formulate the relevant program to improve the hospitalization outcome of patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.