Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41463057›Full record

ReviewBiomedicines2025

Head and Neck Radiotherapy and Dentomaxillofacial Diagnostic Imaging: Biological Interactions and Protective Approaches.

Cyro Daniel Hikaro Fuziama, Ana Cristina Borges-Oliveira, Lana Ferreira Santos, Sérgio Lúcio Pereira de Castro Lopes, Andre Luiz Ferreira Costa

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomedicines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Cyro Daniel Hikaro FuziamaPostgraduate Program in Dentistry, Dentomaxillofacial Radiology and Imaging Laboratory, Cruzeiro do Sul University (UNICSUL), São Paulo 01506-000, Brazil.ORCID 0009-0007-2336-1721
Ana Cristina Borges-OliveiraDepartment of Social and Preventive Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte 31270-901, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-3364-4024
Lana Ferreira SantosDepartment of Diagnosis and Surgery, The Institute of Sciences and Technology of São Paulo State University (UNESP), São José dos Campos 12245-000, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-3840-5401
Sérgio Lúcio Pereira de Castro LopesDepartment of Diagnosis and Surgery, The Institute of Sciences and Technology of São Paulo State University (UNESP), São José dos Campos 12245-000, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-0882-5862
Andre Luiz Ferreira CostaPostgraduate Program in Dentistry, Dentomaxillofacial Radiology and Imaging Laboratory, Cruzeiro do Sul University (UNICSUL), São Paulo 01506-000, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-4856-5417

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Radiotherapy is a fundamental component in the management of head and neck malignancies, but its non-selective effects on surrounding normal tissues can result in significant oral complications. The oral cavity and oropharynx contain several radiosensitive structures, including mucosa, salivary glands, and alveolar bone, which are susceptible to both acute and late toxicities resulting in mucositis, xerostomia, and osteoradionecrosis. Although dentomaxillofacial diagnostic imaging, such as intraoral radiography, panoramic imaging and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), delivers radiation doses several orders of magnitude lower than therapeutic exposures, its biological impact on previously irradiated tissues remains underexplored. Even low-dose X-rays may act as secondary stressors, reactivating oxidative and inflammatory pathways in tissues with compromised repair capacity. In this review, we examine the radiobiological and dosimetric implications of using diagnostic ionizing imaging in patients undergoing or recently having completed head and neck radiotherapy. We summarize current evidence on potential additive effects of low-dose imaging, emphasizing the importance of justification, timing, and protocol optimization. Finally, we discuss radioprotective strategies (e.g., dose modulation, field limitation, and integration of modern low-dose imaging technologies) designed to reduce unnecessary exposure, thus enhancing tissue preservation and ensuring diagnostic safety in this vulnerable patient population.

Indexed as

head and neck squamous cell carcinomaoral mucositisprecision oncologyradiation injuryradiobiology

Identifiers

PMID41463057
PMCPMC12731011

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.