ReviewBiomedicines2025
Head and Neck Radiotherapy and Dentomaxillofacial Diagnostic Imaging: Biological Interactions and Protective Approaches.
Review in Biomedicines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Radiotherapy is a fundamental component in the management of head and neck malignancies, but its non-selective effects on surrounding normal tissues can result in significant oral complications. The oral cavity and oropharynx contain several radiosensitive structures, including mucosa, salivary glands, and alveolar bone, which are susceptible to both acute and late toxicities resulting in mucositis, xerostomia, and osteoradionecrosis. Although dentomaxillofacial diagnostic imaging, such as intraoral radiography, panoramic imaging and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), delivers radiation doses several orders of magnitude lower than therapeutic exposures, its biological impact on previously irradiated tissues remains underexplored. Even low-dose X-rays may act as secondary stressors, reactivating oxidative and inflammatory pathways in tissues with compromised repair capacity. In this review, we examine the radiobiological and dosimetric implications of using diagnostic ionizing imaging in patients undergoing or recently having completed head and neck radiotherapy. We summarize current evidence on potential additive effects of low-dose imaging, emphasizing the importance of justification, timing, and protocol optimization. Finally, we discuss radioprotective strategies (e.g., dose modulation, field limitation, and integration of modern low-dose imaging technologies) designed to reduce unnecessary exposure, thus enhancing tissue preservation and ensuring diagnostic safety in this vulnerable patient population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.