ReviewCancers2025
Advances in Preoperative and Intraoperative Technologies for Safe Resection of Gliomas in Cognitive Regions.
Review in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Advances in neuroimaging and intraoperative mapping have transformed brain tumour surgery from anatomy-based resection to function-guided intervention. This review synthesises current evidence on multimodal strategies for maximising tumour removal while preserving cognitive and neurological function. Integrating task-based and resting-state functional MRI (fMRI), diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), tractography, and connectomic analysis enables personalised mapping of eloquent and cognitive networks. Intraoperatively, awake craniotomy with direct electrical stimulation (DES) remains the gold standard for real-time functional validation, while adjuncts such as intraoperative MRI (iMRI), 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) fluorescence, and ultrasound-based extended resection accuracy. However, these technologies present unique limitations, including neurovascular uncoupling in fMRI, tract distortion in DTI, and resource constraints in low-income settings. Our review differentiates their application across low-grade and high-grade gliomas, emphasising that tumour biology determines the balance between neuroplasticity-driven mapping and imaging-guided radicality. Key future priorities include validation of multimodal imaging protocols, integration of longitudinal neuropsychological outcomes, and development of interpretable connectomic models. Addressing the technological and ethical challenges of high-field MRI, data standardisation, and cost-effective implementation will be essential for equitable global adoption. Ultimately, the evolution of functional neurosurgery depends not only on new technologies but on integrating multimodal evidence and patient-centred outcome measures to achieve reproducible, safe, and personalised brain tumour surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.