Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41463145›Full record

ReviewCancers2025

Artificial Intelligence and New Technologies in Melanoma Diagnosis: A Narrative Review.

Sebastian Górecki, Aleksandra Tatka, James Brusey

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sebastian GóreckiMaria Sklodowska-Curie Medical Academy, Al. Solidarności 12, 03-411 Warszawa, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-5700-4000
Aleksandra TatkaMaria Sklodowska-Curie Medical Academy, Al. Solidarności 12, 03-411 Warszawa, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-8268-894X
James BruseyCentre for Computational Science and Mathematical Modelling, Coventry University, Priory Street, Coventry CV1 5FB, West Midlands, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2710-6927

Funding

Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education MNiSW/2025/DPI/72
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Melanoma is among the most lethal forms of skin cancer, where early and accurate diagnosis significantly improves patient survival. Traditional diagnostic pathways, including clinical inspection and dermoscopy, are constrained by interobserver variability and limited access to expertise. Between 2020 and 2025, advances in artificial intelligence (AI) and medical imaging technologies have substantially redefined melanoma diagnostics. This narrative review synthesizes key developments in AI-based approaches, emphasizing the progression from convolutional neural networks to vision transformers and multimodal architectures that incorporate both clinical and imaging data. We examine the integration of AI with non-invasive imaging techniques such as reflectance confocal microscopy, high-frequency ultrasound, optical coherence tomography, and three-dimensional total body photography. The role of AI in teledermatology and mobile applications is also addressed, with a focus on expanding diagnostic accessibility. Persistent challenges include data bias, limited generalizability across diverse skin types, and a lack of prospective clinical validation. Recent regulatory frameworks, including the European Union Artificial Intelligence Act and the United States Food and Drug Administration's guidance on adaptive systems, are discussed in the context of clinical deployment. The review concludes with perspectives on explainable AI, federated learning, and strategies for equitable implementation in dermatological oncology.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceclinical validationdermoscopyexplainable AIfederated learningmelanomaoptical coherence tomographyreflectance confocal microscopyteledermatologyvision transformers

Identifiers

PMID41463145
PMCPMC12731220

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.