ReviewCancers2025
Determinants of Response to Immune Checkpoint Blockade in Pleural Mesothelioma: Molecular, Immunological, and Clinical Perspectives.
Review in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- An analysis of succinate dehydrogenase B in pleural mesothelioma.Discover oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Diffuse pleural mesothelioma (PM) is a rare thoracic malignancy with historically limited treatment options and poor outcomes. Despite the recent breakthrough of dual immune checkpoint blockade (ICB)-notably the combination of anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4 therapies-clinical responses remain variable and overall survival gains modest. Consequently, there is an urgent need for multidimensional biomarkers and adaptive trial designs to unravel the complexity of PM immune biology. This review provides a comprehensive overview of current evidence on how histological subtypes (epithelioid vs. non-epithelioid) influence ICB efficacy, highlighting distinct genetic landscapes (e.g., BAP1, CDKN2A, NF2 mutations) and tumor microenvironment (TME) features, including immune infiltration patterns and PD-L1 or VISTA expression, that underlie differential responses. We further examine intrinsic tumor factors-such as mutational burden and checkpoint ligand expression-and extrinsic determinants, including immune cell composition, stromal architecture, patient immune status, and microbiota, as modulators of immunotherapy outcomes. We also discuss the rationale behind emerging strategies designed to enhance ICB efficacy, currently under clinical evaluation. These include combination regimens with chemotherapy, radiotherapy, surgery, epigenetic modulators, anti-angiogenic agents, and novel immunotherapies such as next-generation checkpoint inhibitors (LAG-3, VISTA), immune-suppressive cell-targeting agents, vaccines, cell-based therapies, and oncolytic viruses. Collectively, these advancements underscore the importance of integrating histological classification with molecular and microenvironmental profiling to refine patient selection and guide the development of combination strategies aimed at transforming "cold" mesotheliomas into "hot," immune-responsive tumors, thereby enhancing the efficacy of ICB.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.