Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41463600›Full record

ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Agentic AI and Large Language Models in Radiology: Opportunities and Hallucination Challenges.

Sara Salehi, Yashbir Singh, Kelly K Horst, Quincy A Hathaway, Bradley J Erickson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. The Convergence of Precision and Cognition in Biomedical AI.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sara SalehiRadiology Informatics Lab, Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.ORCID 0009-0003-3223-9059
Yashbir SinghDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5848-7072
Kelly K HorstRadiology Informatics Lab, Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0163-0963
Quincy A HathawayDepartment of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8226-2319
Bradley J EricksonRadiology Informatics Lab, Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7926-6095

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The field of radiology is experiencing rapid adoption of large language models (LLMs), yet their tendency to generate hallucinations (plausible but incorrect information) remains a significant barrier to trust. This comprehensive review evaluates emerging agentic artificial intelligence (AI) approaches, including multi-agent role-based systems, retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), and uncertainty quantification, to assess their potential for reducing hallucinations in radiology workflows. Evidence from 2024 to 2025 demonstrates that agentic AI can improve diagnostic accuracy and reduce error rates, though these methods remain computationally demanding and lack comprehensive clinical validation. Multi-agent frameworks enable cross-validation through role-based specialization and systematic workflow orchestration, while RAG strategies enhance accuracy by grounding responses in verified medical literature. Within multi-agent systems, uncertainty quantification enables agents to communicate confidence levels to one another, allowing them to appropriately weigh each other's contributions during collaborative analysis. While multi-agent frameworks and RAG strategies show significant promise, practical deployment will require careful integration with human oversight, robust evaluation metrics tailored to medical imaging tasks, and regulatory adaptation to ensure safe clinical use in diverse patient populations and imaging modalities.

Indexed as

agentic AIclinical decision supporthallucinationlarge language modelsmedical imagingmulti-agent systemsradiologyretrieval-augmented generation

Identifiers

PMID41463600
PMCPMC12729288

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.